Why do we use COMP-3 variables for computation, when we know that they are non displayable fields and require additional MOVE to numeric field before we populate it in output Reports?
- 1 Answers
- 5740 Views
- Accenture, I also Faced
- E-Mail Answers
Answer / raj
COMP-3 fields take less memory allocation and effective in computation.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 2 Yes | 0 No |
i declare a Table as OCCURS 2000 TIMES.If the input file has more than 2000 records will the COBOL program fail?
How much salary you are expecting? If they ask in an interview, what we have to tell?
6 Answers Tech Mahindra, Wipro,
Scenario: I have 3 Input Files.Read the first i/p file and depending on certain business logic, I want to read wither i/p file-2 or i/p file-3.Now, depending on certain business logic applied to the record read from either file-2 or file-3, I decide to write them to either output file-2 or output file-2. Question: How many job steps are necessary to implement a solution for the above.
Why do we code s9 (4) comp. Inspite of knowing comp-3 will occupy less space?
How to covert given string into ASCII value in COBOL/MF COBOL
which is Best IBM Mainframe Training and Placement Institute in Ameerpet Hyderabad
without performing any operations on a file how can i know whether it contains data or not
how to access the file from prodution from changeman tool and to submit a file to production
can we declare s9(9)v9(9) in cobol ? if yes how many bytes it will occupy ?(urgent plz answer it)
input:- 12233344445555566666... output:- 1=1,2=4,3=9... Here firstno i.e 1 should be displayed and after that the alikeno.s should be added n displayed.i.e 2+2=4 like tat it goeson.
hw to create 3 dimensional array & hw to access it?
I have sequential file recl 1000 i want to add another 15 bytes to it. The record length should not change..How?
COBOL 
