There is a table with emp salary column how to get the fields belongs to the salary greater than the average salary of particular department.
Write a query
Answers were Sorted based on User's Feedback
Answer / ram
SELECT * FROM emp e WHERE sal > (SELECT AVG(sal) FROM emp m
WHERE e.deptno = m.deptno GROUP BY deptno) ORDER BY deptno
gives u salary greater than the average salary of their
departments...
Is This Answer Correct ? | 22 Yes | 4 No |
Answer / murali krishna udayagiri
SELECT E.* FROM EMP E ,(SELECT DEPTNO,AVG(SAL) AVGSAL FROM
EMP GROUP BY DEPTNO) E1
WHERE E.SAL>E1.AVGSAL
AND E.DENPTNO=E1.DEPTNO;
Thanks,
Murali Udayagiri
Is This Answer Correct ? | 6 Yes | 2 No |
Answer / manoj
SELECT *FROM EMP WHERE SAL>(SELECT AVG(SAL) FROM EMP WHERE
DEPTNO=10);
this is correct answer. all the above answer are wrong except last one. Because in single row sub query we can't use group by clause. In all above queries they were used '>' simbol. So this is single row sub query matching operator.
Is This Answer Correct ? | 3 Yes | 0 No |
Answer / sameer
Select * from emplyees
Where sal>(select avg ( sal) from emplyees )
No need to write complex queries
Is This Answer Correct ? | 2 Yes | 1 No |
Answer / vivek singh
SELECT * FROM EMP WHERE SAL>(SELECT AVG(SAL) FROM EMP)
AND DEPTNO=10;
O/P:
7839 KING PRESIDENT 17-NOV-81 5000 10
7782 CLARK MANAGER 7839 09-JUN-81 2450 10
Is This Answer Correct ? | 0 Yes | 0 No |
Answer / lokesh y g
select e.no,e.name,e.salary from emp e where salary >
(select avg(salary)as salary from emp e1 where e.no=e1.no
group by no)
Is This Answer Correct ? | 1 Yes | 3 No |
Answer / sri
SELECT *FROM EMP WHERE SAL>(SELECT AVG(SAL) FROM EMP WHERE
DEPTNO=10);
Is This Answer Correct ? | 4 Yes | 6 No |
can any one explain me about junk dimension
performance wise which one is better in joiner and lookup transformation?why?explain clearly?
how we can update a target table without update strategy and update override?
how to work with mapplet designer in informatica?
What is active and passive transformation?
suppose i have source 101 a 101 b 101 c 101 d i want target like 101 abcd how will u achive this please give me the answer
When you move from devel to prod how will you retain a variable
How You Pull the records on daily basis into your ETL Server.
tell me the push down optimization
performance wise which one is better in joiner and lookup transformation
source is a flat file empname, empno, sal ram, 101, 1,000 sam, 102, 2,000 ques: my target needs the data to be loaded as sal -1000 and 2000 excluding commas target empname, empno, sal ram, 101, 1000 sam, 102, 2000 how to implement this?
How many input parameters can exist in an unconnected lookup?