Difference between .NET components and COM components?
Answers were Sorted based on User's Feedback
Answer / virat
Com component needs registeration and .Net component
doesn't require it.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 2 Yes | 0 No |
Answer / shanker
.NET applications are managed by .NET Runtime so it is
useful for memory management,security,caching,versioning)
and so it is said as Managed.But COM Components are said as
Unmanaged.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 3 Yes | 1 No |
Answer / abhishek maitrey
COM was not designed to be extensible whereas .Net
component are run within COM+ applications so no COM
callable wrapper is required. Hence it runs as a .Net
component.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 2 Yes | 3 No |
What is transaction atomicity?
Can .NET Framework components use the features of Component Services?
What is the new three features of COM+ services, which are not there in COM (MTS)
What are loosely coupled events?
What is manageability?
What are CCW and RCW?
Why we learn the 8085? Because we are in 21 century so why we learn 8085?
How does you handle this COM components developed in other programming languages in .NET?
What happens when we instantiate a .NET component ?
Define scalability?
Which namespace do the classes, allowing you to support COM functionality, are located?
What is CCW (COM Callable Wrapper) ?
Visual Basic (800)
C Sharp (3816)
ASP.NET (3180)
VB.NET (461)
COM+ (79)
ADO.NET (717)
IIS (369)
MTS (11)
Crystal Reports (81)
BizTalk (89)
Dot Net (2435)
Exchange Server (362)
SharePoint (720)
WCF (340)
MS Office Microsoft (6963)
LINQ Language-Integrated Query (317)
WPF (371)
TypeScript (144)
Microsoft Related AllOther (311)