Difference between .NET components and COM components?
- 3 Answers
- 7108 Views
- Microsoft, I also Faced
- E-Mail Answers
Answers were Sorted based on User's Feedback
Answer / virat
Com component needs registeration and .Net component
doesn't require it.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 2 Yes | 0 No |
Answer / shanker
.NET applications are managed by .NET Runtime so it is
useful for memory management,security,caching,versioning)
and so it is said as Managed.But COM Components are said as
Unmanaged.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 3 Yes | 1 No |
Answer / abhishek maitrey
COM was not designed to be extensible whereas .Net
component are run within COM+ applications so no COM
callable wrapper is required. Hence it runs as a .Net
component.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 2 Yes | 3 No |
what is the relational database of tables and forms
Define scalability?
Explain the use of contextutil class?
Define availability?
What is manageability?
Explain consistency?
Is it true that COM objects no longer need to be registered on the server?
Explain how does you handle this com components developed in other programming languages in .net?
Explain the disadvantages of com components?
Explain object pooling?
What are rcw?
Explain how to register com+ services?
-
Visual Basic (800) - C Sharp (3816)
- ASP.NET (3180)
- VB.NET (461)
- COM+ (79)
- ADO.NET (717)
- IIS (369)
- MTS (11)
- Crystal Reports (81)
- BizTalk (89)
- Dot Net (2435)
- Exchange Server (362)
- SharePoint (720)
- WCF (340)
- MS Office Microsoft (6963)
- LINQ Language-Integrated Query (317)
- WPF (371)
- TypeScript (144)
- Microsoft Related AllOther (311)
