Interested to Buy Any Domain ? << Click Here >> for more details...
Does automation replace manual testing?
- 2 Answers
- 5296 Views
- I also Faced
- E-Mail Answers
Answers were Sorted based on User's Feedback
Answer / bhaskar pothuri
No. We go for automation once the build is stabilized at a
predetermined quality.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 0 Yes | 0 No |
Answer / sid
No Automation Can not and will not replace Manual testing.
Automation is a great idea. To make it a good investment as
well, the secret is to think about testing first and
automation second. If testing is a means to the end of
understanding the quality of the software, automation is
just a means to this means
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 0 Yes | 1 No |
Any kind of test which you think should not be automated?
Do you know what is a xpath?
1. How would you Test & then automate an antivirus application? 2. How would u test & automate windows screen saver? (expected: "test scenarios" & "test approch": points)
How you will describe testing activities?
Explain Bug Life Cycle and expalin briefly each 'Status' also
How can a mainframe application be tested using Automation tools. I mean which is the best tool to do Mainframe testing?
Do you know how to verify if the checkbox/radio is checked or not?
Which of the Test cases can be automated? can anybody tell me with an example.
What is mean by ARGO testing? can any one please explain
what is best bug in your project?
How will you choose a tool for test automation?
What are the important modules of an automation testing framework?
WinRunner 
