Answer Posted / sid
No Automation Can not and will not replace Manual testing.
Automation is a great idea. To make it a good investment as
well, the secret is to think about testing first and
automation second. If testing is a means to the end of
understanding the quality of the software, automation is
just a means to this means
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 0 Yes | 1 No |
Post New Answer View All Answers
IS DATA INTEGRITY TESTING AND INTEGRATION TESTING ONE AND THE SAME?IF DIFF CAN U SPECIFY THE DIFFERENCES
What is a ‘test plan’? What is a ‘test case’?
what is the dictionary objects in QTP? and what is method of vb script using virtual object wizard........
Please explain what is a relative xpath?
can anyone suggest me any low cost tool that can support both Manual and Automation testing ?
I am new to jmeter and i am working on .net application.I am recording the requests and pop up images data are not recording.can some one suggest an idea regarding this
Is automation testing in agile methodology useful or not?
How would you test your own element locator?
What are the disadvantages of Hybrid framework
Can you tell some good coding practices while automation?
Why do you prefer selenium automation tool?
Can you do without a framework?
Tell us how do you get the width of the textbox?
Highlight attributes of good framework?
What is an automated test script?