Golgappa.net | Golgappa.org | BagIndia.net | BodyIndia.Com | CabIndia.net | CarsBikes.net | CarsBikes.org | CashIndia.net | ConsumerIndia.net | CookingIndia.net | DataIndia.net | DealIndia.net | EmailIndia.net | FirstTablet.com | FirstTourist.com | ForsaleIndia.net | IndiaBody.Com | IndiaCab.net | IndiaCash.net | IndiaModel.net | KidForum.net | OfficeIndia.net | PaysIndia.com | RestaurantIndia.net | RestaurantsIndia.net | SaleForum.net | SellForum.net | SoldIndia.com | StarIndia.net | TomatoCab.com | TomatoCabs.com | TownIndia.com
Interested to Buy Any Domain ? << Click Here >> for more details...


is java purely oop Language?

Answers were Sorted based on User's Feedback



is java purely oop Language? ..

Answer / swapna

java is not a pure object oriented .its partially object
oriented.object oriented means every thing should be used in
terms of objects.in java we use datatypes with out creating
any objects.using java we can do fully object oriented
programming.so its a partially object oriented.

Is This Answer Correct ?    107 Yes 20 No

is java purely oop Language? ..

Answer / sujith

Perfect answer by Swapna. Java is not pure object oriented.
Data types are still not objects except String. I think the
only pure object oriented language still is smalltalk,
though i havent explored much with c#.

Is This Answer Correct ?    45 Yes 13 No

is java purely oop Language? ..

Answer / vijay tandel

Java is not pure OOP Language because it uses primitive data
types.

Is This Answer Correct ?    17 Yes 3 No

is java purely oop Language? ..

Answer / baalu aanand

No, because
1) data types not declaring by object except String, data
types are declaring in Literal types
2) It not support Multilevel inheritance
3) It does n't support operator overloading


So, java is not purely OOP concept

Is This Answer Correct ?    15 Yes 4 No

is java purely oop Language? ..

Answer / ravi

no ,
java is not a purely object oriented language because it
doesnot support the feature multiple inhetiance .
it support the feature interface instead of multiple
inheritance

Is This Answer Correct ?    23 Yes 15 No

is java purely oop Language? ..

Answer / mahaveer bhaskar

no, because it uses primitive data type

Is This Answer Correct ?    10 Yes 2 No

is java purely oop Language? ..

Answer / manikandan

Java is purely OOPL.primitives are simple datatypes in java
all the collections classes are uses wrapper class only not
a simple data types In all the applications we uses wrapper
class only not a primitives.we use primitives only for a
learning purpose and java supports native language that so
primitives still lives in java

Is This Answer Correct ?    5 Yes 0 No

is java purely oop Language? ..

Answer / girish

No,java is not pure object oriented language ,not
everything done by an object.Pure oopl is small talk.

Is This Answer Correct ?    10 Yes 7 No

is java purely oop Language? ..

Answer / mathi

Java is not a pure oop lang. Smalltalk is a pure oop
language.

Is This Answer Correct ?    9 Yes 6 No

is java purely oop Language? ..

Answer / vinay chowdary

According to oopl specification a language which considers
each and every component as an object.
1.But in java primitive datatypes are there so we can
consider java as not fullfledged oopl.
2.all of u guys plz think that java also providing wrapper
classes for each primitive,so can't it be full object
orientation(plz respond me on this point)

Is This Answer Correct ?    3 Yes 0 No

Post New Answer

More OOPS Interview Questions

string is a class or data type in java?

3 Answers  


What are different types of JVM's? for example we use dalvik jvm for android then what about the remaining operating systems?

0 Answers   IBM,


What are the main differences between procedure oriented languages and object oriented languages?

9 Answers   IBM, Infosys, Wipro,


Are polymorphisms mutations?

0 Answers  


Why do we need polymorphism in c#?

0 Answers  


explain defference between structure and class with example

2 Answers  


Name an advantage of array over linked list?

24 Answers   GML, IBM, Software Solutions,


What is the real time example of encapsulation?

0 Answers  


In multiple inheritance , to create sub class object , is there need to create objects for its superclasses??? in java and c++ both. Actually i have some information that is , all available members from its superclasses , memory created in subclass obj , so no need to create object for its superclasses...??? Thanks in Advance

1 Answers  


What are the benefits of polymorphism?

0 Answers  


What are the components of marker interface?

0 Answers  


When is it necessary to use member-wise initialization list in C++?

2 Answers   Adobe,


Categories