which is better perfomancewise lookup or joiner and why?can anyone give example?

Answers were Sorted based on User's Feedback



which is better perfomancewise lookup or joiner and why?can anyone give example?..

Answer / vijay pal

It depends upon the Situation...
In Homo-genous sources(both the sources are RDBMS), Joiner
has good performance
In Hetro-genous sources (like RDBMS & Flat file) look up
would be better.

But If you want RDBMS data in more than one places, better
go for Lookup than Joiner

Hope it have answered you question :)

Is This Answer Correct ?    5 Yes 3 No

which is better perfomancewise lookup or joiner and why?can anyone give example?..

Answer / etl guru

Give the perfect solution.Every knows what told.

Is This Answer Correct ?    0 Yes 0 No

which is better perfomancewise lookup or joiner and why?can anyone give example?..

Answer / 78swapnil

All you guys are correct. But there is a major difference between lookup and joiner is, when you join the table we need to join on the basis of a join condition (=) but in case of lookup you can get the data join conditions like (=,!=,<=,>=).

Is This Answer Correct ?    0 Yes 0 No

which is better perfomancewise lookup or joiner and why?can anyone give example?..

Answer / lokesh.t

lookup is having multiple advantages compare to joiner
transformations :-it will avoid duplicate vlues . by
using first last value in lkp values . with lkp we can n
nnumber of tables. where as in joiner we can join only
two tables

Is This Answer Correct ?    1 Yes 3 No

which is better perfomancewise lookup or joiner and why?can anyone give example?..

Answer / pawan

R u looking for flat or database file?
Generally sorted joiner more effective on flat files than lookup, because sorted joiner uses merge join and cache less rows. Lookup caches always whole file. If the file is not sorted, it can be comparable. Lookups into DB table can be effective if the DB can return sorted data fast and the amount of data is small, because lookup can create whole cache in memory. If DB responses slowly or big amt of data r processed, lookup cache initialization can be really slow.
Then it can be better use sorted joiner, which throws data to output as reads them on input.

Is This Answer Correct ?    0 Yes 2 No

which is better perfomancewise lookup or joiner and why?can anyone give example?..

Answer / m.m.basha

performwise both (connected& unconnected) are best
connected lookup :-it is connected to the source
unconnected loockup:- it is not connected to the source

Is This Answer Correct ?    1 Yes 12 No

Post New Answer

More Informatica Interview Questions

How to delete the (flat file) data in the target table after loaded.

2 Answers   TCS,


Mention some types of transformation?

0 Answers  


my source is a comma delimited flatfile as eno, ename, sal 111,sri,ram,kumar,1000 and my target should be eno ename sal 111 sri ram kumar 1000 i.e; we need to eliminate the commas in between the data of a comma delimited file.

5 Answers   IBM,


Explain the informatica workflow?

0 Answers  


What is target load order?

0 Answers  






how to get the first row without using rank t/r?

7 Answers   iGate,


Under what condition selecting sorted input in aggregator may fail the session?

0 Answers  


Explain what are the different types of transformation available in informatica. And what are the mostly used ones among them?

0 Answers  


need for registering a repository server

1 Answers  


CAN WE IMPLEMENT SCD TYPE 1 AND SCD TYPE 2 IN SAME MAPPING? IF SO HOW?

6 Answers  


How do you convert single row from source into three rows into target?

0 Answers  


What is CHECK-IN CHECK-OUT. Please explane me?

3 Answers   TCS,


Categories