is throwing exception from a constructor not a good practice ?
- 5 Answers
- 9566 Views
- Ericsson, I also Faced
- E-Mail Answers
Answers were Sorted based on User's Feedback
Answer / vikas sood
throwing exception from a constructor is not bad at all. It
is actually advised to use exceptions when you fail to
create your object properly due to any reason. In this case
memory will not be allocated for the object and no
destructor will be called.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 11 Yes | 1 No |
Answer / manjunath
Throwing a exception from constructor is perfectly good
habit. That is how to handle errors in the constructor.
Smart pointers can also be used in this scenario.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 4 Yes | 1 No |
Answer / dps
ya its better i think because it will take less memory and
less time
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 0 Yes | 0 No |
Answer / shwetha.v.g
Actualy though when an object is created memory will b
allocated but the process of allocation of memory will be
complete only if conytructor is successfully invoked so if
constructor throws an exception memory will not be
allocated for that object.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 1 Yes | 6 No |
Answer / saranya
yes, because constructor does not throws an exception
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 1 Yes | 8 No |
What is low level language in simple words?
Differentiate between C and C++.
Differentiate between late binding and early binding. What are the advantages of early binding?
What is a forward referencing and when should it be used?
What is the difference between new/delete and malloc/free?
why the size of an empty class is 1
What are manipulators used for?
What is lazy initialization in c++?
Hi i need to Acess a variable "int Intval" in the below mentioned code .How to Access it guys i am waiting for your reply
Why is c++ is better than c?
Can a list of string be stored within a two dimensional array?
what is difference between static and non-static variables
STL 
