is throwing exception from a constructor not a good practice ?
Answers were Sorted based on User's Feedback
Answer / vikas sood
throwing exception from a constructor is not bad at all. It
is actually advised to use exceptions when you fail to
create your object properly due to any reason. In this case
memory will not be allocated for the object and no
destructor will be called.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 11 Yes | 1 No |
Answer / manjunath
Throwing a exception from constructor is perfectly good
habit. That is how to handle errors in the constructor.
Smart pointers can also be used in this scenario.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 4 Yes | 1 No |
Answer / dps
ya its better i think because it will take less memory and
less time
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 0 Yes | 0 No |
Answer / shwetha.v.g
Actualy though when an object is created memory will b
allocated but the process of allocation of memory will be
complete only if conytructor is successfully invoked so if
constructor throws an exception memory will not be
allocated for that object.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 1 Yes | 6 No |
Answer / saranya
yes, because constructor does not throws an exception
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 1 Yes | 8 No |
Explain function overloading and operator overloading.
What are inline functions?
How do you differentiate between overloading the prefix and postfix increments?
What is the need of a destructor?
How do you initialize a string in c++?
What is boyce codd normal form in c++?
What is a lambda function c++?
What are the general quetions are in DEna bank manager IT/System interviews?
How do you establish an is-a relationship?
Define pure virtual function?
What are the advantages of using a pointer? Define the operators that can be used with a pointer.
What are the unique features of C++.