is throwing exception from a constructor not a good practice ?
Answers were Sorted based on User's Feedback
Answer / vikas sood
throwing exception from a constructor is not bad at all. It
is actually advised to use exceptions when you fail to
create your object properly due to any reason. In this case
memory will not be allocated for the object and no
destructor will be called.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 11 Yes | 1 No |
Answer / manjunath
Throwing a exception from constructor is perfectly good
habit. That is how to handle errors in the constructor.
Smart pointers can also be used in this scenario.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 4 Yes | 1 No |
Answer / dps
ya its better i think because it will take less memory and
less time
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 0 Yes | 0 No |
Answer / shwetha.v.g
Actualy though when an object is created memory will b
allocated but the process of allocation of memory will be
complete only if conytructor is successfully invoked so if
constructor throws an exception memory will not be
allocated for that object.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 1 Yes | 6 No |
Answer / saranya
yes, because constructor does not throws an exception
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 1 Yes | 8 No |
Define what is constructor?
Write a program to find the Factorial of a number
Why did you leave your last job?
If you don’t declare a return value, what type of return value is assumed?
How the programmer of a class should decide whether to declare member function or a friend function?
What is function declaration in c++ with example?
tell me about yourself ?i want answer for frehers with various exasmples?
What do you mean by ‘void’ return type?
What are shallow and deep copy?
What does namespace mean in c++?
What are dynamic type checking?
What are the advantages of c++ over c?