Follow Our FB Page << CircleMedia.in >> for Daily Laughter. We Post Funny, Viral, Comedy Videos, Memes, Vines...


Why not virtual functions to handle messages?

Answers were Sorted based on User's Feedback



Why not virtual functions to handle messages?..

Answer / chandrasekharreddy siddamreddy

In MFC we have lot of base classes those are having so many
virtual functions. For each class one virtual table will be
created. This will consume lot of memory and our application
performance will go down. This is the only reason MFC is not
using virtual function for message mapping.

Is This Answer Correct ?    13 Yes 4 No

Why not virtual functions to handle messages?..

Answer / abhijit

Implementing virtual mechanism to handle messages would
have made the message dispatch process very expensive as
* every class of any window type would have a huge virtual
function dispatch table associated with it.

Instead having static array of function pointers ensures
only one copy for a given class

Is This Answer Correct ?    5 Yes 2 No

Why not virtual functions to handle messages?..

Answer / spiker

Only classes derived from the CCmdTarget class can get the benefits of message map.For that we need to use DECLARE_MESSAGEMAP, BEGIN_MESSAGEMAP, END_MESSAGEMAP macros.
when we declare a message map it will create an array to keep all the information about the messages to be handled.

Overall the messages are handled by the base class CCmdTarget.
Virtual function is one of the best concept of oops,its for managing objects and functions.

No need of vtables to handle messages.

Is This Answer Correct ?    1 Yes 0 No

Why not virtual functions to handle messages?..

Answer / ctharam

Virtual functions are not space-efficient because they require vtables, and vtables consume memory even if the functions in them are not overridden.

The amount of memory used by a message map, in contrast, is proportional to the number of message entries it contains.

Since it's extremely rare for a developer to implement a window class that includes handlers for all of the different types of messages, message mapping conserves a few hundred bytes of memory just about every time a CWnd is wrapped around an HWnd.

Is This Answer Correct ?    1 Yes 0 No

Why not virtual functions to handle messages?..

Answer / malli

we have to prefix "afx_msg" before every function to create
message map.

Is This Answer Correct ?    0 Yes 12 No

Post New Answer



More MFC Interview Questions

if no message handler is available for a message then will deal with the message ? does window proving any default mechanism?

2 Answers   Patni,


what is the use of CWinApp class?

3 Answers   Mphasis,


What view class enables you to use an edit control as a view?

1 Answers  


1) Enable or disable a Cancel button at run time?

1 Answers   HCL,


What is the difference between the ASSERT and VERIFY macros?

4 Answers  






i have created runtime menu -- ( admistrator ->managepackage,manage module). but now i want to open a dialog when i select manage package and any other diaolg when selecting manage module ( whole selection is at run time only ) . Please HELP .its urgently required

3 Answers   Patni,


1)dynamic creation of a Button ?

2 Answers   TCS,


What function is used to disable a control at runtime?

7 Answers  


How you create a button dynamically?

2 Answers  


what is the use of Mutex and critical section

2 Answers  


what message is sent to an application when the user presses the primary button?

0 Answers   University Exams,


What is stack size in win32 program?

1 Answers   HCL,






Categories