Does automation replace manual testing?
- 1 Answers
- 4081 Views
- I also Faced
- E-Mail Answers
Answer / mahesh sv
1. No. It helps the manual tester in regression testing
when time is a main factor.
We can rerun the same tests again and again with multiple
sets of data using data driven test.
2. No, manual testing cannot be replaced with the
Automation. Automation can be done at an extent of maximum
to 90-99% not 100 percent, since the tool itself will have
certain limitations about the memory management, resources,
platform on which the product need to be tested
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 1 Yes | 0 No |
Can anybody tell me the any open source automation testing tool for functional testing to test web based application.? pls suggest its urgent.
Why do you want to keep this kind of information in a separate file and not directly in the code?
How you will describe testing activities?
Tell me what databases can test director reside on?
you have any interaction with clients?
Hi everyone, Are you looking for "worksoft certify" automation tool training online? We have experienced corporate Worksoft certify trainers. We also provide support Worksoft certify automation issues. Please contact us Automationsolutions@yahoo.com
What is extreme programming and what has it got to do with testing?
default time for executing 1000 lines of script in winrunner and also in qtp.
How can a mainframe application be tested using Automation tools. I mean which is the best tool to do Mainframe testing?
How to write output data to a file (txt,csv,excel) using Test complete automation tool?
What is use of writing Test cases
Suppose we r running a test which have 7 to 8 steps for different functionallity of and object..and suppose upto 4 step test passes but after 5th step test fails. what u will do in this condition will u start the test again or will u consider that rest steps will be working fine.
WinRunner 
