Can we have a private constructor ?
Answers were Sorted based on User's Feedback
Answer / srikanth
We can make a constructor Private or protected.
1. Private constructor is classic example of implementing a
singleton class( A class with a single instance)
2. Protected constructors can be used when the class cannot
be instantiated but can only be inherited.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 108 Yes | 2 No |
Answer / prabha govind
yes
and if a constructor is made private/protected...then that
class cannot be inherited
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 116 Yes | 23 No |
Answer / baikunta
yes , we can creat private constructor trrough static
method we can access the class (constructor), for example
singleton, there are a lot of use in design pattern
here is example of single ton
class Singleton {
static Singleton s;
int i;
Singleton(int x) : i(x) { }
void operator=(Singleton&);
Singleton(const Singleton&);
public:
static Singleton& getHandle() {
return s;
}
int getValue() { return i; }
void setValue(int x) { i = x; }
};
Singleton Singleton::s(47);
int main() {
Singleton& s = Singleton::getHandle();
cout << s.getValue() << endl;
Singleton& s2 = Singleton::getHandle();
s2.setValue(9);
cout << s.getValue() << endl;
} ///:~
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 34 Yes | 1 No |
Answer / arun
1. Yes we can make a constructor private. By implementing
this concept we can create a singleTon class.
2. Suppose we have a static method is a class that is used
to create the object of the class by using private
constructor then that member function is named as "Named
Constructor".
3. Using this named constructor concept we can create
SingleTon class as well as normal class.
Example:
class Singleton
{
public:
static Singleton* Instance();
protected:
Singleton();
Singleton(const Singleton&);
Singleton& operator= (const Singleton&);
private:
static Singleton* pinstance;
};
Singleton* Singleton::pinstance = 0;// initialize pointer
Singleton* Singleton::Instance ()
{
if (pinstance == 0) // is it the first call?
{
pinstance = new Singleton; // create sole instance
}
return pinstance; // address of sole instance
}
Singleton::Singleton()
{
//... perform necessary instance initializations
}
Singleton *p1 = Singleton::Instance();
Singleton *p2 = p1->Instance();
Singleton & ref = * Singleton::Instance();
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 25 Yes | 0 No |
Answer / arun
#include<iostream>
using namespace std;
class Singleton
{
public:
static Singleton* Instance();
private:
static Singleton* pinstance;
Singleton();
};
Singleton* Singleton::pinstance = 0;// initialize pointer
Singleton* Singleton::Instance ()
{
if (pinstance == 0) // is it the first call?
{
pinstance = new Singleton; // create sole instance
}
return pinstance; // address of sole instance
}
Singleton::Singleton()
{
//... perform necessary instance initializations
}
void main()
{
Singleton *p1 = Singleton::Instance();
cout<<p1<<endl;
Singleton *p2 = p1->Instance();
cout<<p2<<endl;
Singleton & ref = * Singleton::Instance();
}
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 9 Yes | 4 No |
Answer / aj
Yes, only if we want to prevent instantiation from other
class, but then the class itself cannot be sub classed.
this the heart of singleton design pattern
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 3 Yes | 1 No |
#include<iostream>
using namespace std;
class A
{
int value;
A* ptr;
A()
{
cout<<"\n\t\tConctructor\n";
}
public:
static A* CreateObject()
{
A* ptr=NULL;
ptr=new A;
return ptr;
}
void getdata()
{
cout<<"\n\tEnter the Value of A class\t:\t";
cin>>value;
}
void putdata()
{
cout<<"\n\t\tThe Value of A Class\t:\t";
cout<<value<<endl;
}
~A()
{
cout<<"\n\t\tDestructor\n";
}
};
int main()
{
A *ptr,*ptr1,*ptr3;
ptr=A::CreateObject();
ptr1=A::CreateObject();
ptr3=A::CreateObject();
ptr->getdata();
ptr1->getdata();
ptr3->getdata();
ptr->putdata();
ptr1->putdata();
ptr3->putdata();
delete ptr;
delete ptr1;
delete ptr3;
return 0;
}
Ref:
Singleton and Factory
Classes...
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 3 Yes | 5 No |
Answer / ashwini
Yes, We can.
By doing so, we can create only single instance of the
class.(singleton)
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 0 Yes | 6 No |
Answer / arpitha
no, its of no use having a private constructor,,, bcoz
declaring constructor as private makes it blocked.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 6 Yes | 24 No |
When not to use object oriented programming?
Who invented oop?
1. Strong name 2. how to prevent a class from being inherited 3. delegates 4. default modifier for interface 5. default modifier for class 6. base class for exception 7. diff bet trigger and view in sql 8. how to exchange values from one page to another page 9. can multiple catch block ll be executed at same time 10. can u store different data types in an array & array list 11. when we ll use trigger 12. try,catch,finally usage
How to hide the base class functionality in Inheritance?
Why is there no multiple inheritance?
What is the real life example of polymorphism?
What are the benefits of polymorphism?
What is super in oop?
What is the output of the following code: int v() { int m=0; return m++; } int main() { cout<<v(); } 1) 1 2) 0 3) Code cannot compile
Write a program to demonstrate the use of 'Composition' in C++
I hv a same function name,arguments in both base class and dervied class, but the return type is different. Can we call this as a function overloading? Explain?
what is the diffrence between c# and c++