What's the difference between transferring a FSMO role and
seizing one? Which one should you NOT seize? Why?
- 1 Answers
- 24463 Views
- I also Faced
- E-Mail Answers
Answer / sheik mohamed syed ali
Seizing an FSMO can be a destructive process and
should only be attempted if the existing server with the
FSMO is no longer available.
If you perform a seizure of the FSMO roles from a DC, you
need to ensure two things:
the current holder is actually dead and offline, and that
the old DC will NEVER return to the network.
If you do an FSMO role Seize and then bring the previous
holder back online, you'll have a problem.
An FSMO role TRANSFER is the graceful movement of
the roles from a live, working DC to another live DC
During the process, the current DC holding the role(s) is
updated, so it becomes aware it is no longer the role holder
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 32 Yes | 2 No |
1 word is equal?
You work as the application developer at Certkiller .com. You are working on an application named Certkiller App11. Certkiller App11 must be configured to execute a series of mathematical computations simultaneously. What should you do next to configure Certkiller App11 to execute a series of mathematical computations simultaneously?
What is WINS server? where we use WINS server? difference between DNS and WINS?
What are the requirements for installing AD on a new server?
Which file system support Raid concept.FAT or NTFS
What is LDP? What is REPLMON? What is ADSIEDIT? What is NETDOM? What is REPADMIN?
how to create the mutiple ftp site in windows 2000 server
How would you find all users that have not logged on since last month?
what is the difference between 32 bit os and 64 bit os
Name a few differences in Vista GPOs
what is the different between windows xp home edition and professional ?
What is Web Space? Where we use Web Space?
Cisco Certifications 
