Which command is more efficient?
*(ptr+1) or ptr[1]
- 3 Answers
- 5963 Views
- I also Faced
- E-Mail Answers
Answers were Sorted based on User's Feedback
Answer / purna
*(ptr+1);
Internally the same operation is performed with the next
one also.
it takes less time.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 1 Yes | 2 No |
Answer / poornima
If ptr is declared as a pointer like int *ptr; *(ptr+1) is
more efficient.
If ptr is declared as an array like int ptr[20]; ptr[1] is
more efficient.
So, it depends upon how we r declaring ptr as a pointer or
as an array.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 1 Yes | 3 No |
What is #include in c?
Why calloc is better than malloc?
How arrays can be passed to a user defined function
What is the main differences between C and Embedded C?
hello freinds next week my interview in reliance,nybody has an idea about it intervew questions..so tell
Write a program of prime number using recursion.
Is linux written in c?
What is enumerated data type in c?
How can I access a memory located at certain address?
What are local variables c?
a direct address that identifies a location by means of its displacement from a base address or segment a) absolute address b) relative address c) relative mode d) absolute mode
What are the commands should be given before weiting C Program i.e, Cd.. like
4 Answers IBM, Infonet, Satyam, Tech Mahindra,
C 
