Which command is more efficient?
*(ptr+1) or ptr[1]
- 3 Answers
- 7896 Views
- I also Faced
- E-Mail Answers
Answers were Sorted based on User's Feedback
Answer / purna
*(ptr+1);
Internally the same operation is performed with the next
one also.
it takes less time.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 1 Yes | 2 No |
Answer / poornima
If ptr is declared as a pointer like int *ptr; *(ptr+1) is
more efficient.
If ptr is declared as an array like int ptr[20]; ptr[1] is
more efficient.
So, it depends upon how we r declaring ptr as a pointer or
as an array.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 1 Yes | 3 No |
Program to display given 3 integers in ascending order
Can 'this' pointer by used in the constructor?
main() { char *p1="Name"; char *p2; p2=(char *)malloc(20); while(*p2++=*p1++); printf("%s\n",p2); }
How can I increase the allowable number of simultaneously open files?
Rapunzel walks into the forest of forgetfullness. She meets a Lion who lies on Monday Tuesdays and Wednesdays and meets a rabbit who lies on Thurs fridays and saturdays . On that day both say that "I lied yesterday". What day is it .
implement general tree using link list
How many types of operator or there in c?
how do you execute a c program in unix.
Why c is called procedure oriented language?
What’s the special use of UNIONS?
What is the Lvalue and Rvalue?
Write a C program to fill a rectangle using window scrolling
C 
