consider the following piece of code
01 GROUP-ITEM
05 AMOUNT-1 PIC 99V9 USAGE COMP VALUE 50
05 AMOUNT-2 PIC 9(4)V99 USAGE COMP
MOVE ZERO TO GROUP-ITEM
ADD 50 TO AMOUNT-1
what will be the content of AMOUNT-1?
a.50
b.100
c.0
d.unpredictable
Answer Posted / shan
A.50
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 0 Yes | 2 No |
Post New Answer View All Answers
In which area will you utilize 88 level items in cobol?
)If there are 10 steps in GDG, if I want to refer the step2 after step5 . what should I do?
If you are current on the owner of a set, what is the difference between an obtain next and obtain first? Actually in which topic will we use dis???Plz explain it clearly
Explain how will you differentiate between an internal and an external sort, the pros and cons, internal sort syntax etc
What is a SSRANGE and NOSSRANGE?
what is the use of outrecord?
I have a File that has duplicate records. I need only those records that occur more than thrice.?
Can a Search can be done on a table with or without Index?
How do you reference the fixed block file formats from cobol programs
Explain how you can characterize tables in cobol?
how do you reference the rrds file formats from cobol programs
What is the LINKAGE SECTION used in COBOL?
How to get the last record in vsam file in cluster? And how can you get the ksds file records into cobol program?
How to read the 2nd last record of a VSAM file? (The file size is huge and we don't know the key)
Our issue is there seems to be a disconnect, or no link, between our SELECT statement and our SD. We had SELECT SORT-FILE and SELECT SORT-FILE ASSIGN TO SORTWRK. ASSIGN TO SORTWRK1 SORTWRK2 SORTWRK3 SORTWRK4. with SD SORT_FILE RECORD CONTAINS 7833 CHARACTERS. In either case, at run time, the system ignored our SORTWRK# DD statements and allocated 16 sort works with the SORTWK## naming convention. Any ideas why the system does not recognize the connection? We do not even need the SORTWRK DD statements. Thanks