How can we increase the size of an existing PDS to include
more no. of modules.
I tried the answer posted by Jagan(TSO PDS 'pds name') but
did not find it working.
The answer posted by kamal i know very well.
Please suggest me a answer so that we don't need to delete
the existing PDS and still we can change the size as well.
Answer Posted / vipin
There is way to increase the PDS directory block without
taking the back-up. If you are using file manager, Go to
utilities and then you can get the option for PDS
allocation. This way you can increase the PDS directory
block and it also creates the back-up of the old attributes
dataset
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 3 Yes | 2 No |
Post New Answer View All Answers
What are the cobol coding sheets?
can anybody post me about file-aid and changemen tools pls and give me reference if any mainframe guys are there
IF I mention stop run in CICS what happens?
how to move the records from file to array table. give with code example
Define static linking and dynamic linking.
Name the divisions, which are available in a cobol program?
What guidelines should be followed to write a structured cobol prgm?
how do you define single dimensional array and multidimensional array in your cobol?
What is the difference between Call and a Link?
What is link edit in cobol?
How to remove 2 duplicate records and copy only one using job control language?
Differentiate cobol and cobol-ii. (Most of our programs are written in cobolii, so, it is good to know, how, this is different from cobol)?
For rewrite, why is it mandatory that file needs to be opened?
What is amode(24)?
I have a program with an Array of 5000 occurences which is being passed from 5 sub levels to the front end screen. Thess 5 programs using each 5*2 = 10 different arrays with size as 5000. This is causing the transaction to utilize more storage consupmtion. I am looking to reduce the storage consumption. As part of that initially i thought Dynamic array may solve my problem. After viewing the comments given i see its same as normal array. IS there any other way we can resolve this issue?