which one is better among static call and dynamic call?

Answer Posted / sab

Which one to use is depends on the situation.

If your code is small then its better to use static call as
it also speed up performance and it will be easy to track
the versions in small code.


If you are working with large number of subroutines, its
always good to use dynamic linking as it will save storage
space as well as will maintain versions of code easily.

Satisfied with answer...???

Is This Answer Correct ?    11 Yes 0 No



Post New Answer       View All Answers


Please Help Members By Posting Answers For Below Questions

) how do u code after getting data?

1580


What is amode(31)

724


Define static linking and dynamic linking.

669


Discuss about changing dataset name in proc.

760


Write a program that uses move corresponding.

673






Explain sorting techniques in cobol program? Provide the sort file definition, the sort statement, its syntax and meaning

684


how do you reference the ksds vsam file formats from cobol programs

666


input 1 input2 ouput1 output2 output 3 1 re 300 1 re 200 1 re 300 3 rc 500 1 re 200 2 rr 400 1 re 300 2 rr 400 1 rc 400 3 rc 500 1 rc 400 2 rr 700 2 rr 700 5 tt 900 5 tt 900 2 inputs r in flat file and output 1 is matched records,ouptput2 is unmatched of input1,output3 is unmatched of input2! how vl u get the output files using sequential order and to check with each and every records! let me know the procedure division ?

1874


How to fetch 1000 error records from VSAM file(Eg: 1000000 records present) while getting SOC7 abend ?

1939


I have a File that has duplicate records. I need only those records that occur more than thrice.?

8654


How to change size of Initial number of records to *NOMAX for ALL PF files from perticular library, how can I do that

2730


Why occurs cannot be used in 01 level in COBOL?

718


Why do we code s9 (4) comp. Inspite of knowing comp-3 will occupy less space?

720


What are various search techniques in cobol? Explain.

650


how to refer the data field?

1812