use of operator overloading of implicit & explicit operators?
Answer / karthikeyant
Implicit:
By eliminating unnecessary casts, implicit conversions can
improve source code readability. However, because implicit
conversions can occur without the programmer's specifying
them, care must be taken to prevent unpleasant surprises.
In general, implicit conversion operators should never
throw exceptions and never lose information so that they
can be used safely without the programmer's awareness. If a
conversion operator cannot meet those criteria, it should
be marked explicit.
class MyType
{
public static implicit operator int(MyType m)
{
// code to convert from MyType to int
}
}
MyType x;
// implicitly call MyType's MyType-to-int conversion
operator
int i = x;
Explicit:
declares a user-defined type conversion operator that must
be invoked with a cast. For example, this operator converts
from a class called Fahrenheit to a class called Celsius:
// Must be defined inside a class called Farenheit:
public static explicit operator Celsius(Farenheit f)
{
return new Celsius((5.0f/9.0f)*(f.degrees-32));
}
Farenheit f = new Farenheit(100.0f);
Celsius c = (Celsius)f;
Is This Answer Correct ? | 3 Yes | 0 No |
What is stringreader in c#?
what's the Difference between DataView and DataTable?
Explain About namespaces
What is tpl in c#?
What is an interface class in c#?
What are the main reasons to use c# language?
What is binding in c#?
When a switch is said to be congested?
What does void mean in c#?
What is hash c#?
Can you have an array of arrays?
how dot net compiled code will become platform independent?