Is following functions are said to be overloaded?
int add(int a,int b)
char *add(int a,int b)
Answers were Sorted based on User's Feedback
Answer / arunkumar995
Function overloadig can not be achive only chaining the
return type.We must havv to change the aruments.
int add(int a,int b)
char*add(int a,int b)
one think that return type not make important role in
function overloading.In fun Overloading must effect on the
arguments.
Thus we say the given [int add(int a,int b)
char*add(int a,int b)]is not function overloaded.
Is This Answer Correct ? | 6 Yes | 1 No |
Yes the said funtion add is overloaded.
But it is in ambiguous state because of passing element is
same.
Compiler will differ with the passing elements, but dont
consider the return value.
In this quiestion the two add funtion having two different
return type int & char * respectively.
I think the below one will be correct example for
overloaded function.
int add(int a,int b);
char *add(float a,int b);
Is This Answer Correct ? | 8 Yes | 7 No |
Answer / ajay singh
No above function is not overloaded .... function over
loading can take place if the signature of the function is
different and the signature of the function do not include
the return type
Is This Answer Correct ? | 0 Yes | 0 No |
what is meant by files?
How do you define social class?
what is polymorpsim? what are its types?
Why do we use encapsulation in oops?
Which is the only operator in C++ which can be overloaded but NOT inherited?
What is the problem with multiple inheritance?
what is the virtual function overhead, and what is it used for ? i hope i can get and appropriate answers, thanks a lot....
What does no cap mean?
What is a mixin class?
Which is the parameter that is added to every non-static member function when it is called?
What is memory leak and memory corruption?
Describe what an Interface is and how it?s different from a Class.