Interested to Buy Any Domain ? << Click Here >> for more details...
Difference between Composition and Aggregation
- 2 Answers
- 23615 Views
- Protech, I also Faced
- E-Mail Answers
Answers were Sorted based on User's Feedback
Answer / benjamin jacob
Composition : Defines a strong-coupled relationship between
two entities, where the one entity is part of another, and
both need each other for their existence. e.g. Human body
and the Heart.
Aggregation : Defines a weak-coupled relationship between
two entities, where one entity could be part of another, but
either can exist without the other, independantly. e.g.
School and teacher.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 85 Yes | 5 No |
Answer / paul howard
Composition can be used to model by-value aggregation which
is semantically equivalent to an attribute. In fact
composition was originally called aggregation-by-value in an
earlier UML draft with “normal” aggregation being thought of
as aggregation-by-reference. The definitions have changed
slightly but the general ideas still apply. The distinction
between aggregation and composition is more of a design
concept and is not usually relevant during analysis.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 14 Yes | 5 No |
Can we use static method definitions in interfaces?
When will you use an interface and abstract class?
What is a static method? Why do we need static methods in java 8 interfaces?
Is iterator a class or interface? What is its use?
Differentiate between an abstract class and an interface?
Why do we separate interface from implementation?
Give any criteria when you use an abstract class and an interface?
0 Answers Sans Pareil IT Services,
What are the major differences between late and dynamic binding?
What is a functional interface? What is sam interface?
Why does the function arguments are called as "signatures"?
Difference: Activity Diagram and Sequence Diagram
What is the difference between an Abstract class and Interface?
Design Patterns 
