how effective communication can be made ?

Answers were Sorted based on User's Feedback



how effective communication can be made ?..

Answer / srisudha

Effective - so that the other person understands what
exactly is being spoken about and without asking to repeat
it.

Is This Answer Correct ?    10 Yes 4 No

how effective communication can be made ?..

Answer / suda

For an effective communication _
-Maintain eye contact and face to face contact.
speakboldly and clearly,
be to the point(speak only the matter);
whtever u speak, speak with confidence;
interact with people listening to u withe their interest;
pause at a right time;
the way of taking and speech can be change acc. to the
facial expression,feedback of listener.........

Is This Answer Correct ?    7 Yes 1 No

Post New Answer

More English Interview Questions

where still you go?

0 Answers  


first prime minister of india

6 Answers  


What is compounding infoobjects?

0 Answers   Wipro,


Tolerate synonym?

4 Answers   WNS, Yardi,


what is the smallest bird in world?

11 Answers  






plz give me last 10 yrs questions for face the exam held on 6 july on my email address.

3 Answers   Bank Of India, ONGC, State Bank Of India SBI,


Please send me on copy for SBI CLERCKICAL EXAM MODEL PAPERS IN MY MAIL ID: rasirajubaskhar@yahoo.com.

1 Answers  


In SAP MM where the Material Master Data And Vendor Master Data Stored

2 Answers   HCL, Yardi,


I have applied Railway ASM post.please send general english questions paper to me.thanks.

0 Answers  


If one always ought to act so as to produce the best possible circumstances, then morality is extremely demanding. No one could plausibly claim to have met the requirements of this "simple principle." . . . It would seem strange to punish those intending to do good by sentencing them to an impossible task. Also, if the standards of right conduct are as extreme as they seem, then they will preclude the personal projects that humans find most fulfilling. From an analytic perspective, the potential extreme demands of morality are not a "problem." A theory of morality is no less valid simply because it asks great sacrifices. In fact, it is difficult to imagine what kind of constraints could be put on our ethical projects. Shouldn't we reflect on our base prejudices, and not allow them to provide boundaries for our moral reasoning? Thus, it is tempting to simply dismiss the objections to the simple principle. However, in Demands of Morality, Liam Murphy takes these objections seriously for at least two distinct reasons. First, discussion of the simple principle provides an excellent vehicle for a discussion of morality in general. Perhaps, in a way, this is Murphy's attempt at doing philosophy "from the inside out.". . . Second, Murphy's starting point tells us about the nature of his project. Murphy must take seriously the collisions between moral philosophy and our intuitive sense of right and wrong. He [must do so] because his work is best interpreted as intended to forge moral principles from our firm beliefs, and not to proscribe beliefs given a set of moral principles. [Murphy] argues from our considered judgments rather than to them. . . For example, Murphy cites our "simple but firmly held" beliefs as supporting the potency of the over-demandingness objection, and nowhere in the work can one find a source of moral values divorced from human preferences. Murphy does not tell us what set of "firm beliefs" we ought to have. Rather, he speaks to an audience of well-intentioned but unorganized moral realists, and tries to give them principles that represent their considered moral judgments. Murphy starts with this base sense of right and wrong, but recognizes that it needs to be supplemented by reason where our intuitions are confused or conflicting. Perhaps Murphy is looking for the best interpretation of our convictions, the same way certain legal scholars try to find the best interpretation of our Constitution. This approach has disadvantages. Primarily, Murphy's arguments, even if successful, do not provide the kind of motivating force for which moral philosophy has traditionally searched. His work assumes and argues in terms of an inner sense of morality, and his project seeks to deepen that sense. Of course, it is quite possible that the moral viewpoints of humans will not converge, and some humans have no moral sense at all. Thus, it is very easy for the moral skeptic to point out a lack of justification and ignore the entire work. On the other hand, Murphy's choice of a starting point avoids many of the problems of moral philosophy. Justifying the content of moral principles and granting a motivating force to those principles is an extraordinary task. It would be unrealistic to expect all discussions of moral philosophy to derive such justifications. Projects that attempt such a derivation have value, but they are hard pressed to produce logical consequences for everyday life. In the end, Murphy's strategy may have more practical effect than its first-principle counterparts, which do not seem any more likely to convince those that would reject Murphy's premises.

0 Answers   Accenture,


Perl qustions,UNIX are at third section. Three sections. 1 & 2 for dsa and c apti and 3rd for (unix and perl) and dbms(only 3 questions).

1 Answers  


Rich man needs it The poor man has it If you eat it, you will die...

11 Answers   Infosys, Lanco, Sri Chaitanya,


Categories