Golgappa.net | Golgappa.org | BagIndia.net | BodyIndia.Com | CabIndia.net | CarsBikes.net | CarsBikes.org | CashIndia.net | ConsumerIndia.net | CookingIndia.net | DataIndia.net | DealIndia.net | EmailIndia.net | FirstTablet.com | FirstTourist.com | ForsaleIndia.net | IndiaBody.Com | IndiaCab.net | IndiaCash.net | IndiaModel.net | KidForum.net | OfficeIndia.net | PaysIndia.com | RestaurantIndia.net | RestaurantsIndia.net | SaleForum.net | SellForum.net | SoldIndia.com | StarIndia.net | TomatoCab.com | TomatoCabs.com | TownIndia.com
Interested to Buy Any Domain ? << Click Here >> for more details...


int main()
{
int *p=new int;
*p=10;
del p;
cout<<*p;
*p= 60;
cout<<*p;
}
what will be the output & why?

Answers were Sorted based on User's Feedback



int main() { int *p=new int; *p=10; del p; cout<<*p; ..

Answer / sethuu

First output will print some garbage value because you
delete the object p and the you print.

The second one will print value 60.

Is This Answer Correct ?    11 Yes 3 No

int main() { int *p=new int; *p=10; del p; cout<<*p; ..

Answer / jaroosh

There will be an error because its "del" instead of "delete".
In this particular program, you might actually get away with
using p after delete, but lets look what happens here :

int *p=new int;
*p=10;
cout << "ADDRESS OF P is " << p << endl;
delete p;
int * x= new int(3);
cout << "ADDRESS OF X=" << *x << " is " << x << endl;
*p = 10; //We think we got away with deleting p so why not
//still use it!
cout << "VALUE OF X : " << *x; //Here is why...

now, though its basically a policy of compiler, here is what
probably WILL happen in the output (memory addresses are
exemplary):
ADDRESS OF P is 0x272740
ADDRESS OF X=3 is 0x272740
VALUE OF X : 10
Now this is totally NOT what we would like our program to
do, and this is because though delete WILL mostly call
objects destructors and sometimes even clear memory, but p
is STILL pointing to that location, to which compiler
assumes it is safe to allocate variable x!
So now we end up having ONE memory storage and two pointers
p and x pointing to it.
This is why though it will not crash your compilation and
probably you can get away with no runtime errors, this leads
to serious troubles and as a rule NEVER use pointers after
you deleted their storage.

Is This Answer Correct ?    7 Yes 1 No

int main() { int *p=new int; *p=10; del p; cout<<*p; ..

Answer / hemang

There will be error because del is used instead of delete. in c++ delete is the keyword not del. delete is used to delete an object.

So program will not run....

Is This Answer Correct ?    6 Yes 0 No

int main() { int *p=new int; *p=10; del p; cout<<*p; ..

Answer / anu

I think error will come bcoz memory allocated to *P is
already deleted d it will point to nowhere now....

Is This Answer Correct ?    3 Yes 5 No

Post New Answer

More C Interview Questions

what is the size of an integer variable?

4 Answers  


Why cann't whole array can be passed to function as value.

1 Answers  


write a program to print the consecutive repeated character from the given string... input string is : hhhhjkutskkkkkggggj output should be like this: hhhhkkkkkgggg anyone help me...

0 Answers  


How to print %d in output

6 Answers   Wipro,


What is Heap?

3 Answers  


What was noalias and what ever happened to it?

0 Answers  


What is the use of pragma in embedded c?

0 Answers  


Determine if a number is a power of 2 at O(1).

2 Answers  


DIFFERNCE BETWEEN THE C++ AND C LANGUAGE?

2 Answers   Wipro,


how to go with this?

1 Answers   Wipro,


What are register variables in c?

0 Answers  


I need previous papers of CSC.......plz help out by posting them.......

0 Answers  


Categories