Answer / ravis190784

Comparing Adapter Pattern with other Patterns:

1. Adapter converts one interface to another, Decorator doesn't alter interface but adds responsibility. Facade makes an interface simpler.
Decorator is thus more transparent to the application than an adapter is. As a consequence, Decorator supports recursive composition, which isn't possible with pure Adapters.

2. Adapters allows client to make use of libraries and subsets without changing any code. Decorators allow new behaviour to be added to the classes with out altering the existing code.

3. Adapter make things work after they're designed, Bridge makes them work before they are.

4. Bridge is designed up-front to let the abstraction and the implementation vary independently. Adapter is retrofitted to make unrelated classes work together.

5. Adapter provides a different interface to its subject. Proxy provides the same interface. Decorator provides an enhanced interface.

6. Facade defines a new interface, whereas Adapter reuses an old interface. Remember that Adapter makes two existing interfaces work together as opposed to defining an entirely new one.

What is the difference between adapter and facade?

0 Answers  

---

If a client does not like a design what will your approach be?

4 Answers  

---

What is your research methodology?

1 Answers  

---

Can you explain singleton pattern?

0 Answers  

---

Is mvc is a design pattern?

0 Answers  

---

What are the types of design patterns?

0 Answers  

---

. How do you manage timelines?

1 Answers  

---

What is singleton and factory pattern?

0 Answers  

---

Quartus II software version 6.0 is available for which operating systems (OS)?

0 Answers  

---

What three types of components comprise an application design?

1 Answers  

---

what are design patterns..?what design patterns used in .net.

1 Answers  

---

What do you do to ensure that your design is carried out perfectly from your end?

3 Answers  

---