Why isn't XHTML2 backwards compatible?
Answer / guest
It is, but in a different way to how previous versions of
HTML were backwards compatible.
Because earlier versions of HTML were special-purpose
languages, it was necessary to ensure a level of backwards
compatibility with new versions so that new documents would
still be usable in older browsers. For instance, this is why
the <meta> element has its content in an attribute rather
than in the content of the element, since it would have
shown up in older browsers.
However, thanks to XML and stylesheets, such strict
element-wise backwards compatibility is no longer necessary,
since an XML-based browser, of which at the time of writing
means more than 95% of browsers in use, can process new
markup languages without having to be updated. Much of XHTML
2 works already in existing browsers, browsers that are not
pre-programmed to accept XHTML2. Much works, but not all:
when forms and tables were added to HTML, people had to wait
for new version of browsers; similarly some parts of XHTML
2, such as XForms and XML Events, still require user agents
that understand that functionality.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 1 Yes | 0 No |
What is <form> tag?
What means dhtml?
What is the correct html5 element for playing video files?
What do you mean by xhtml?
What is the br /> tag?
What is the difference between br and br />?
What does yw mean?
What are the differences between cell spacing and cell padding?
What is the difference between <link> and <a> tags?
How can tables be made nested in html?
How do you use meta in html?
Is audio tag supported in html 5?