Golgappa.net | Golgappa.org | BagIndia.net | BodyIndia.Com | CabIndia.net | CarsBikes.net | CarsBikes.org | CashIndia.net | ConsumerIndia.net | CookingIndia.net | DataIndia.net | DealIndia.net | EmailIndia.net | FirstTablet.com | FirstTourist.com | ForsaleIndia.net | IndiaBody.Com | IndiaCab.net | IndiaCash.net | IndiaModel.net | KidForum.net | OfficeIndia.net | PaysIndia.com | RestaurantIndia.net | RestaurantsIndia.net | SaleForum.net | SellForum.net | SoldIndia.com | StarIndia.net | TomatoCab.com | TomatoCabs.com | TownIndia.com
Interested to Buy Any Domain ? << Click Here >> for more details...

English Interview Questions
Questions Answers Views Company eMail

how to improve english comprehension/composition. if any website pls let me know

2 6541

why you join genpact?

Genpact,

1 5289

when will you seen after five years?

Genpact,

2085

what did you do yesterday?

Genpact,

9 15600

hows your last weekend?

Genpact,

7 15205

which insurance company is with ambit

2071

what i have to speak to introduce my topic

2211

can u send me last 5 years tax assistant examination solved papers

HCL, SSC, Tax Assistant,

3 7390

what is gumption

2 5380

I want the previous sucess model papers

State Bank Of India SBI,

2031

If one always ought to act so as to produce the best possible circumstances, then morality is extremely demanding. No one could plausibly claim to have met the requirements of this "simple principle." . . . It would seem strange to punish those intending to do good by sentencing them to an impossible task. Also, if the standards of right conduct are as extreme as they seem, then they will preclude the personal projects that humans find most fulfilling. From an analytic perspective, the potential extreme demands of morality are not a "problem." A theory of morality is no less valid simply because it asks great sacrifices. In fact, it is difficult to imagine what kind of constraints could be put on our ethical projects. Shouldn't we reflect on our base prejudices, and not allow them to provide boundaries for our moral reasoning? Thus, it is tempting to simply dismiss the objections to the simple principle. However, in Demands of Morality, Liam Murphy takes these objections seriously for at least two distinct reasons. First, discussion of the simple principle provides an excellent vehicle for a discussion of morality in general. Perhaps, in a way, this is Murphy's attempt at doing philosophy "from the inside out.". . . Second, Murphy's starting point tells us about the nature of his project. Murphy must take seriously the collisions between moral philosophy and our intuitive sense of right and wrong. He [must do so] because his work is best interpreted as intended to forge moral principles from our firm beliefs, and not to proscribe beliefs given a set of moral principles. [Murphy] argues from our considered judgments rather than to them. . . For example, Murphy cites our "simple but firmly held" beliefs as supporting the potency of the over-demandingness objection, and nowhere in the work can one find a source of moral values divorced from human preferences. Murphy does not tell us what set of "firm beliefs" we ought to have. Rather, he speaks to an audience of well-intentioned but unorganized moral realists, and tries to give them principles that represent their considered moral judgments. Murphy starts with this base sense of right and wrong, but recognizes that it needs to be supplemented by reason where our intuitions are confused or conflicting. Perhaps Murphy is looking for the best interpretation of our convictions, the same way certain legal scholars try to find the best interpretation of our Constitution. This approach has disadvantages. Primarily, Murphy's arguments, even if successful, do not provide the kind of motivating force for which moral philosophy has traditionally searched. His work assumes and argues in terms of an inner sense of morality, and his project seeks to deepen that sense. Of course, it is quite possible that the moral viewpoints of humans will not converge, and some humans have no moral sense at all. Thus, it is very easy for the moral skeptic to point out a lack of justification and ignore the entire work. On the other hand, Murphy's choice of a starting point avoids many of the problems of moral philosophy. Justifying the content of moral principles and granting a motivating force to those principles is an extraordinary task. It would be unrealistic to expect all discussions of moral philosophy to derive such justifications. Projects that attempt such a derivation have value, but they are hard pressed to produce logical consequences for everyday life. In the end, Murphy's strategy may have more practical effect than its first-principle counterparts, which do not seem any more likely to convince those that would reject Murphy's premises.

Accenture,

2413

Hi.. can any1 tell me the questions which will be asked in the telephonic round. i am a fresher(2008 passed out). since this will be the first round for me plz suggest me.

2 3960

Respected Sir, I heard that ssc exam is cancelled due to some reason. But i want to ask am i capable for next new date exam & when the new date will be declare. Are u send us new hall tiket or we refer our old hall tiket?

2 4614

Find out what an automated circulation system is all about, illustrate this with two open source library software?

2398

briefly describe your ideal job

Technip,

1 6453


Post New English Questions

Un-Answered Questions { English }

who is the writeof the Tulja novel

2172


if rtd temp. is 45 degree then what would be the resistance according.(if you dont have temp. vs resistance chart)

1970


Differentiate between skimming and scanning.

1355


tell me about national and international issue?

1941


i need section engineer previous question papers.if anybody have it plzzz send to my email id :prad60@gmail.com

1997


The New Deal in America began in 1933 and included widespread bank reforms, unprecedented government infrastructure spending, and unparalleled expansion in the size of government. Some political commentators and economic historians contend that President Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal singlehandedly propelled the United States out of the Great Depression and into decades of uninterrupted prosperity. To support this claim, these economists note that during the years following 1933, GDP grew, unemployment shrunk, and optimism increased. Which of the following statements, if true, would most weaken the above argument? The considerable government expenditures and massive labor requirements engendered by America's entry into World War II in late 1941 helped employ Americans and grow GDP. The considerable debt burden that the government assumed to fund the New Deal sparked fear in the minds of some economists, investors, and businessmen. On average, GDP per capita fell and unemployment rose in many foreign countries during the years after President Roosevelt announced his New Deal. During 1939, the U.S. economy contracted sharply, unemployment jumped 5%, and America's optimism fell.

2190


Meaning for soot:carbon, ash: ?

1048


Differentiate between content and structural words.

1040


Logical appitude

1526


What is global impression scheme with regard to language assessment?

1271


The total weight of a tin and the cookies it contains is 2 pounds after some of the cookies are eaten, the tin and there remaining cookies weigh 0.8 pounds. What is the weight of the empty tin in pounds ?

2732


Which of the following OSPF commands, when used together, will put the network 192.168.10.0/24 into OSPF area 0?

2557


general hr question so asking for interview time company please sir request

2040


in 25 words explain what you understand to be the difference between administrative [immigration] detention and correctional imprisonment.

2243


full detail for antisurgevalve how to work?

2209