1.Write a CRITICAL test cases for calculator ? 2.What is the difference b/w FRS and SRS documents ? 3.What is Component ? 4.What is object ? 5.what is the difference b/w static and dynamic descriptive programming ?

2206

---

how to get no of items from from weblist?

1990

---

Hello sir, pls send me hpcl technical test papers .i am. Appearing for the exam.

2813

---

hi can somebody please post questions that are commonly asked in bba enterance exam in interwiew sessions...also it would be of great help if someone could mail me the previous years papers of the enterance exam of bba of cbs...

2266

---

What are the different stages under software testing life cycle?

113

---

Describe your involvement in re-engineering down-sizing or cost containment processes?

1309

---

Write down ten test cases for below scenario: Increase the day by 1 and date format should be mm/dd/yyyy Conditions are : date should not be greater then 31 and date<1 month should not be greater then 12 and month<1 year should not be greater then 10000 and year<1 Thanks in advance

2381

---

Name three interfaces of r/3 system? Explain them.

678

---

hi sridhar.can u pls send me thae all faq of sap-crm on my e-mail id gargvivek08@gmail.com

2137

---

How can federated learning be used to train AI models?

186

---

What all devices have you worked on?

1075

---

Case Study Please read the case given below and answer the questions given at the end. One afternoon in June 1972, Rao, industrial engineer of P.M.A. company, was called to the office of his immediate superior V.R. Naik, the production manager. Naik said, “Rao, I want to discuss a situation in the production department. A lot of people feel that Govindan is not the right man for the Assistant Superintendent’s position. The President and others have decided that I have got to fire Govindan or at least move him out of production. Everyone wants to fire Govindan, but I won’t do it to him. I was talking with Bhadra this morning, and we decided that you might be able to make use of Govindan in your department.” Rao was surprised by both the information, and the proposal. Naik concluded his comments with, “Rao, I am asking you to take Govindan. You can say ‘No’. But then he gets fired. I have told Govindan this. Also, Govindan knows that if he goes with you he will take a pay cut. However, I think you can make use of him both to your own and his satisfaction. You are, anyway, carrying out an in-process quality control, and you might be able to make good use of Govindan in view of his long technical experience of production work. Think it over, and let me know by tomorrow.” Rao thought over the matter. PMA company had been a successful enterprise until March 1972 at which time it suffered a sharp decline of profits : sales had fallen off, and production costs had risen. The President adopted three measures which he hoped would improve the condition. First, by creating an Industrial Engineering Department for establishing work standards on all production operations, to determine which manufacturing costs were out of line and where remedial action should be taken. Rao, 28 years old, who had been with the company for two years in the Purchasing department, was selected. Rao had B.E. and MBA degrees to his credit. What he lacked in his business experience he made up by his eagerness to learn. He was ambitious and liked by his associates. He wanted a transfer from Purchasing to Production for better opportunities for advancement. Secondly, he consulted a Management Consultation firm to make a study of the Production Department. They pointed out that the chain of command was too long from Production Manager through Plant Superintendent through Assistant Superintendent to Foremen. They recommended the elimination of the position of Assistant Superintendent. Thirdly, he engaged an Industrial Psychologist to appraise all the Supervisory Personnel. Govindan had been with the company for 20 years since its founding and during this period had worked on every production operation, and his last 11 years had been in supervisory capacity. His manners were rough and aggressive, he had little formal education. The industrial Psychologist’s report about Govindan contained the following points: (i) Evaluation for the position of Assistant Superintendent : Not good enough. (ii) Capacity for good human relations in supervision : Will have friction frequently. (iii) Need for development counseling: Counseling greatly needed. (iv) General evaluation: Govindan had a good ability profile. He suffers from a sense of inferiority. He does not like the responsibility of making decisions. His supervision is that of Autocratic type. Though he has the ability, as far as his personality make-up is concerned, he is out of place in the present position. Questions: 1. What is the problem in the case? Explain. 2. Explain Govindan’s behavior and work experience vis-à- vis the psychologist’s report. 3. How do you see Naik’s suggestion to Rao? Give reasons. 4. What are Rao’s considerations in taking a decision? What should he do? Explain.

6513

---

hi this is hema, r there any books in particular for the preparation of the APPSC-A.E.E(electrical), if so please mail me the names ... thank u .

2021

---

when will be the iocl interview results i faced interview on 8th september 2008 iam from electrical branch i faced interview for the post of electrical engineer??????????????????????//

2139

---

what is thermal resistance of PVC Cable.

1917

---