WHY WE GENERATE 3 PHASE POWER ONLY AND NOT 4 OR 5 OR 6
PHASE??? PLS REPLY.

Answer Posted / manikandan

3 phase system generating & transmission is economical,all
the machinerys are working in 3 phase supply ,so why to
generate 4 phse& 5 phase,if generate 4phase the
transmission &distribution is very difficult

Is This Answer Correct ?    1 Yes 2 No



Post New Answer       View All Answers


Please Help Members By Posting Answers For Below Questions

Can i replace Earth leakage relay to the faulty Earth Faulty Relay

1041


Define what is the function of anti-pumping in circuit breaker?

693


sir am giving jspl exam on 19th oct . i belong to eee, so plz send previous question papers ..........to dis id abhilash203@gmail.com

1988


Explain and give me an example of a time when you had to explain some new procedures to your co-workers for quality service delivery, how did you go about it?

1491


What would be the size of wire used for 2 Ton of window A.C?

1424






I am using submission of two ct in one and half scheme for 67/67N protection. Both CTs star point is grounded separately near ct box.Will two point ground give wrong tripping to 67/67N during fault or no matter.

1649


What is the ratio of Booster transformer?

1649


How can eliminate noise problem inside temperature controller temp. variation due to contactor chattering problem.

1190


Z transform is use when system is not a) converges b) diverges

1173


sir my exam is on 19/6/2013 under electrical branch pls send me sample aptitude questions as well as sample technical questions for jindal steel and power company

1808


what is the meaning of number in (11, 31, 61,14, etc. CDG11, CDG31, CDG61, DDT32

901


i have interview in Pepsi company what type of question will ask please send the question and answeer

2986


What are the different types of controllers?

648


I want formula to calculate current loss with distance in km.I searched many sites but didn't right answer.Plz reply me

1553


What are your future plans for the company if permanently employed?

1697