Answer Posted / prakash shrivastava
AFTER THE EXECUTION OF ONE OF WHEN CLAUSE ,THE CONTROL IS
AUTOMATICALLY PASS TO THE NEXT SENTENCE AFTER THE EVALUTE
STATEMENT.THERE IS NO NEED ANY EXTRA CODE FOR EVALUATE
STATEMENT.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 4 Yes | 0 No |
Post New Answer View All Answers
EXPLAIN MAIN FRAME TESTING PROCESS...HOW TO FIX THE MAINFRAME BUGS?
how do you reference the variable block file formats from cobol programs
When is inspect verb is used in cobol?
How do get the result of your program directly on your pc?
What is the difference between next sentence and continue in cobol programing language?
2 input fles: 2 flat files, with different number of records. both are having unique key for each record and already sorted in ascending order . match these files using unique key and in output only matching key value has to be written. please procide cobol logic
How to find out the closest prime number of an input number? I believe it has something to do with SEARCH and COBOL Linear Array.
How to get the last record in vsam file in cluster? And how can you get the ksds file records into cobol program?
Can a Search can be done on a table with or without Index?
What happens when we move a comp-3 field to an edited (say z (9). Zz-)?
Can we change the password using ALTER? anyone tried and changed?
) How do u handle errors in BMS macro
I have a program with an Array of 5000 occurences which is being passed from 5 sub levels to the front end screen. Thess 5 programs using each 5*2 = 10 different arrays with size as 5000. This is causing the transaction to utilize more storage consupmtion. I am looking to reduce the storage consumption. As part of that initially i thought Dynamic array may solve my problem. After viewing the comments given i see its same as normal array. IS there any other way we can resolve this issue?
Our issue is there seems to be a disconnect, or no link, between our SELECT statement and our SD. We had SELECT SORT-FILE and SELECT SORT-FILE ASSIGN TO SORTWRK. ASSIGN TO SORTWRK1 SORTWRK2 SORTWRK3 SORTWRK4. with SD SORT_FILE RECORD CONTAINS 7833 CHARACTERS. In either case, at run time, the system ignored our SORTWRK# DD statements and allocated 16 sort works with the SORTWK## naming convention. Any ideas why the system does not recognize the connection? We do not even need the SORTWRK DD statements. Thanks
What are different data types in cobol?
