Interested to Buy Any Domain ? << Click Here >> for more details...
what is relationship between absorption and transmittance in
u.v.?
- 11 Answers
- 34245 Views
- Orchid, I also Faced
- E-Mail Answers
Answer Posted / subash
absorption is inversely proportional to the transmittance. so,
A light is passed through the solution,if any absorption
take place means transmittance is zero.If any transmittance
takes place absorption is zero.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 1 Yes | 1 No |
Post New Answer View All Answers
inhouse product is in capsule form in combination and RLD is in tablet form then can we proceed for multimedia CDP? in inhouse capsule product disso is paddle with sinker in release media is there then RLD product in tablet form then with same as paddle with sinker we can proceed n.a.?
How can we calculate offset value pH measurment
If inhouse hplc related substance method is completly diffrent from Usp for finished proďuct with diffrent impurities then how require to prove method equivalecy?
Hi sir if any product monograph not given known impurities (may be 5 impurities) specifications then how we require to proceed for inhouse formulation?
If change in specification which parameter require to do for validation? if change in chromtographic condition then which parameter? if api change then which parameter? if change composition then which parameter? if old method not work out then whicj parameter? if additional one impurity added then which parameter of validation require to do on above each conditions? elaborate separately
How to fix the sample conc. in Related substances test by HPLC?
pharma industries oriented
what is the principle involved in turbidometry and nephelometry ?
I have compare C2H2-air and C2H2-N2O flame AAS on determination calcium. Both use same range of std to plot calibration curve. (2-6ppm) When i measure the sample with phosphate, KCl and LaCl, C2H2-N2O flame give false positive result, around 0.5ppm. When i measure the sample with phosphste, KCl and EDTA. C2H2-N2O flame also give 0.5ppm false positive. But both above mentioned sample would not give false positive when measured by C2H2-air flame. What is the reason?
1.What is the difference between method validation and method verification 2.Which guidelines proposed to method transfer
about method developement in hplc
if your impurity coeluting with each other in that situation how require to set specification? is it acceptable?
what is difference between UV - VISIBLE MODEL NO like 1600,1601,1700 etc ? plz explain me
What is the requirement for brazil in the analytical method vslidation comparr to ich?
