Redefines can be used for 01 level in working storage section but not for

can you declare redefine in level 01?

Question Posted / veena (ibm)

8 Answers
18520 Views
Patni, I also Faced
E-Mail Answers

Answer Posted / veena (ibm)

Redefines can be used for 01 level in working storage
section but not for 01 level in file section.

Other rules for redefines:

redefines cannot be used for 66 and 88 levels.
redefined vars level number must be same as the original
var.

Is This Answer Correct ?

11 Yes

0 No

Post New Answer View All Answers

Please Help Members By Posting Answers For Below Questions

What is the difference between Call and a Link?

1120

What rules are followed by the search verb.

1043

i want a program using by if, evaluate , string, unstring, perform, occurs?

4634

What is the difference between Global and External Variables?

1286

What is static and dynamic call in cobol?

998

What is the difference between comp and comp-3 usage?

1121

Name some of the examples of COBOl 11?

3082

What is the difference between a binary search and a sequential search what are the pertinent cobol?

1092

i want to learn mainframe..any websites and material to learn from basic..? my mail id : rajeswaribe2010@gmail.com

2169

Program A (Normal COBBAT) calling a B Program (DB2COBOL, COBBATDB which is using a VSAM file. its a dynamic call. How we will handle VSAM file decleration in our from JCL from where we are running A PGM. And should we have PLAN for A pGM also. if possible can some one post a sample JCL. Thanks for help in advance.

5664

System Testing for Mainframe Developers What is System Testing? integration testing ? what's the procedure ..

2011

What is the LINKAGE SECTION used in COBOL?

1466

Our issue is there seems to be a disconnect, or no link, between our SELECT statement and our SD. We had SELECT SORT-FILE and SELECT SORT-FILE ASSIGN TO SORTWRK. ASSIGN TO SORTWRK1 SORTWRK2 SORTWRK3 SORTWRK4. with SD SORT_FILE RECORD CONTAINS 7833 CHARACTERS. In either case, at run time, the system ignored our SORTWRK# DD statements and allocated 16 sort works with the SORTWK## naming convention. Any ideas why the system does not recognize the connection? We do not even need the SORTWRK DD statements. Thanks

2903

What are the cobol coding sheets?

1170

What is the difference between comp and comp-3?

1130