Answer Posted / niki

Change Compiler ioption NO SSrange to ssrange. But the
Default is NO SSRANGE.

IF U Use Compiler option SSrange, then whenever the
subscript exceeds its declared
number it will give a Eroor.
for example :
A variable is declared like this...

01 field1.
02 field2 pic x(10) occurs 10 times.
Oputput will be

then field2(1) ......field2(10) is allowed when it exceeds
it will give error
ex: field2(11) ----- erro msg will be displayed

Are you comfortable in cobol or jcl?

1044

---

What the difference is between continue and next sentence?

1158

---

What is the difference between Call and a Link?

1192

---

What are the different open modes available in cobol?

1187

---

How arrays can be defined in COBOL?

1213

---

What is rmode(any) ?

1258

---

what is difference bt COND, REGION & TIME parameters at JOB & EXEC. give an exp.

9104

---

What is the difference between comp and comp-3 usage?

1197

---

What is the difference between next sentence and continue in cobol programing language?

1220

---

In which area will you utilize 88 level items in cobol?

1161

---

What is the difference between perform … with test after and perform … with test before?

1439

---

What is the difference between structured cobol programming and object alternativelyiented cobol?

1244

---

Explain how will you differentiate between an internal and an external sort, the pros and cons, internal sort syntax etc

1243

---

I have a program with an Array of 5000 occurences which is being passed from 5 sub levels to the front end screen. Thess 5 programs using each 5*2 = 10 different arrays with size as 5000. This is causing the transaction to utilize more storage consupmtion. I am looking to reduce the storage consumption. As part of that initially i thought Dynamic array may solve my problem. After viewing the comments given i see its same as normal array. IS there any other way we can resolve this issue?

1644

---

Our issue is there seems to be a disconnect, or no link, between our SELECT statement and our SD. We had SELECT SORT-FILE and SELECT SORT-FILE ASSIGN TO SORTWRK. ASSIGN TO SORTWRK1 SORTWRK2 SORTWRK3 SORTWRK4. with SD SORT_FILE RECORD CONTAINS 7833 CHARACTERS. In either case, at run time, the system ignored our SORTWRK# DD statements and allocated 16 sort works with the SORTWK## naming convention. Any ideas why the system does not recognize the connection? We do not even need the SORTWRK DD statements. Thanks

2961

---