Interested to Buy Any Domain ? << Click Here >> for more details...
Is it possible to mutliply a comp variable with an comp-3
variable. Will there be any error if i do it?
- 3 Answers
- 10273 Views
- IBM, UST, I also Faced
- E-Mail Answers
Answer Posted / vikas pujar
Yes. Comp and Comp-3 are used to store numeric values so
operation is valid.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 15 Yes | 1 No |
Post New Answer View All Answers
what is search and searchall?what is the diffrence between them?give an best example?
Why occurs cannot be used in 01 level in COBOL?
What is the local-storage section?
System Testing for Mainframe Developers What is System Testing? integration testing ? what's the procedure ..
I have a program with an Array of 5000 occurences which is being passed from 5 sub levels to the front end screen. Thess 5 programs using each 5*2 = 10 different arrays with size as 5000. This is causing the transaction to utilize more storage consupmtion. I am looking to reduce the storage consumption. As part of that initially i thought Dynamic array may solve my problem. After viewing the comments given i see its same as normal array. IS there any other way we can resolve this issue?
If you are current on the owner of a set, what is the difference between obtain next and obtain first?
What do you understand by psb and acb?
What are the different data types in cobol?
how to convert the recors form vsam file to db2 table tru file aid
How to get the last record in vsam file in cluster? And how can you get the ksds file records into cobol program?
What is the difference between a binary search and a sequential search what are the pertinent cobol?
How to remove 2 duplicate records and copy only one using job control language?
How to change size of Initial number of records to *NOMAX for ALL PF files from perticular library, how can I do that
Our issue is there seems to be a disconnect, or no link, between our SELECT statement and our SD. We had SELECT SORT-FILE and SELECT SORT-FILE ASSIGN TO SORTWRK. ASSIGN TO SORTWRK1 SORTWRK2 SORTWRK3 SORTWRK4. with SD SORT_FILE RECORD CONTAINS 7833 CHARACTERS. In either case, at run time, the system ignored our SORTWRK# DD statements and allocated 16 sort works with the SORTWK## naming convention. Any ideas why the system does not recognize the connection? We do not even need the SORTWRK DD statements. Thanks
What is a SSRANGE and NOSSRANGE?
