what is the impartence of secondary cost element in
controling, if it is needed give reasons
Answer Posted / rkprasad
It's a transfering element which is used to allocate cost
from one cost object to another.
example: if u have 10000/- in your right pocket and u taken
5000/- and kept in left pocket if you use hand to transfer
from right to left that is called secodary cost element.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 8 Yes | 0 No |
Post New Answer View All Answers
hi this is ganesh i am having experiance in finanace ,my graduation -B.COM+ONE year excutive MBA i am looking coaching for SAP(FICO) from realtime experiance person from BANGLORE --if any body is their please mail me -to---ganesh.isbm@gmail.com Thanking you Regards Ganesh
May i know the difference between Direct capitalisation and AUC capitalisation in Fixed Assets
How are vendor invoice payments made?
in require sap fico questions
what is sub contract ?
in which server did number ranges of CO mainly created? is it in development server or in production server? Plz. give the reason.
can we create house for multiple company codes?is it possible to pay cross company code payments? if why please give me answer. thanks for advance
How do you carry-forward account balances? : cost center accounting
What do you mean by chart of accounts? What are its important elements?
What do you mean fixed characteristic fields? : co-pa
Hello SAP FICO consultants, I am Amreshkumar i have completed my BBA in 2009 and currenly appearing for M. com 2nd year & recently completed my SAP FICO module, can anybudy please suggest me how to find job on fresher level? Is there any company who recruites freshers OR is there any consultancies who recruites freshers. please help me.... Suggest me your views on my E-Mail ID: g.amresh@gmail.com ... Thanks...
Will pricing be changed for mysap business suite on linux?
SAP DEPRECIATION RUN ERROR: I have a problem with depreciation posting. I have searched the forum but did not find any answer. Net book value of $ 559,350 as on April 2012 was fully depreciated by 31 Mar 2017. Additions between April 2012 and March 2017 were correctly depreciated. However, additions from 01 Apr 2017 were fully depreciated when depreciation program was executed. For example, asset acquisition on 01 May 2017 $ 2400 was fully depreciated ($ 2400) which is not correct. It should be $ 2000*20%/12*11 = $ 440. Subsequently, in Jan 2018, on the acquisition of $ 207, the system has posted a positive depreciation of $ 47,469 on the base value of $ 1,640,423.72!!! More surprisingly, acquisition after that is correctly depreciated. For example, acquisition on Jan of $ 3,488.94 was correctly depreciated by $ 174.45 (3488.94*20%/12*3 months). Here are the details of the configuration of depreciation: · Depreciation method SLM · Base method 0014 · Useful life: 5 years (20% depreciation). · Period control 01/01/01/01 · Depreciation after the end of planned life – the box is “checked”. · There is only ordinary depreciation. · “Only negative values and zero allowed” checked in Rule for positive/negative sign for ordinary depreciation in Depreciation Area. · Fiscal year: April to March · SAP ECC 6.0 Can anybody suggest/help how to fix this?
explain true reversal, how is it different from regular reversal? : fi- general ledger accounting
What is a year shift/displacement in fiscal year?