Diff B/W
MAP Parameter,
SESSION Paramater,
DataBase connection session parameters.?
Its possible to Create 3parameters at a time?
If Possible which one will fire FIRST?
- 6 Answers
- 15383 Views
- Accenture, HCL, I also Faced
- E-Mail Answers
Answer Posted / srinu
Lokendra,The order was ok,
Diff b/w them,which one is best
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 0 Yes | 0 No |
Post New Answer View All Answers
what is the size ur source like(file system or database)? how many record daily come u r banking project?
I have worked on Informatica 7.1.1. I want to know the answer for the below question. Target is not created initially.Then how to take the DDL script from the source and run the Mapping by creating the Target dynamically?Is it possible by SQL Transformation?
What are junk dimensions?
What is the use of transformation?
What are the measure objects?
What is an Integration service in Informatica?
Write the advantages of partitioning a session?
HAI FRIENDS THIS KISHORE FROM KUMBAKONAM. I HAVE COMPLETED MY MCA IN SASTRA UNIVERSITY WAITING FOR MY 6 TH SEM RESULT.DURING MY PROJECT I HAVE DONE INFORMATICA COURSE AS MY AREA INTEREST COURSE IN CORE MIND TECHNOLOGIES CHENNAI.I HAVE ENQUIRY ABT ALL IT PEOPLE FOR DATAWAREHOUSING THERE IS NO OPENING FOR FRESHERS. WITH SOME EXPERIENCE ANY OTHER DOMAIN TNEN ONLY U CAN GET THAT DOMAIN(DATAWAREHOUSING) JOB.BUT I AM MORE INTEREST ON THAT TO WORK ON THAT DOMAIN(INFORMATICA).WHAT TO I DO. I AM IN HELPLESS FRIENDS/EXPORTS.WAITING FOR REPLY
rank() over (partition by opt2.dim_plat_site_id, opt2.dim_site_opt_sid order by case when opt2.dm_market_flg in ('Y', 'U') then 1 else 2 end, lkp.contact_rank) as rank1, case opt2.contact_type when 'Buyer' then row_number() over (partition by opt2.dim_plat_site_id, opt2.dim_site_opt_sid, lkp.contact_rank order by has_name_flg desc, ship_to_flg desc , last_order_dt desc) when 'Decision Maker' then row_number() over (partition by opt2.dim_plat_site_id, opt2.dim_site_opt_sid, lkp.contact_rank order by has_name_flg desc , last_quote_dt desc , mailability_score desc , source_ranking desc) when 'Influencer' then row_number() over (partition by opt2.dim_plat_site_id, opt2.dim_site_opt_sid, lkp.contact_rank order by has_name_flg desc, mailability_score desc, source_ranking desc) when 'Payer' then row_number() over (partition by opt2.dim_plat_site_id, opt2.dim_site_opt_sid, lkp.contact_rank order by has_name_flg desc, mailability_score desc, source_ranking desc) --elu 05/28/2013 else row_number() over (partition by opt2.dim_plat_site_id, opt2.dim_site_opt_sid, lkp.contact_rank order by has_name_flg desc, mailability_score desc, source_ranking desc) end rank2 row_number() over (partition by opt3.dim_plat_site_id, opt3.dim_site_opt_sid order by rank1,rank2) as "rank", case when "rank"<= opt3.maximum_value then 'Y' else 'N' end as include_flg
How can we improve session performance in aggregator transformation?
Briefly explain the aggregator transformation?
can we override a native sql query within informatica? Where do we do it? How do we do it?
What is the scenario which compels informatica server to reject files?
can anyone explain me about retail domain project in informatica?
Under what conditions selecting sorted input in aggregator will still not boost session performance?
