Interested to Buy Any Domain ? << Click Here >> for more details...
What is the difference between Perform para and perform
asaection in cobol?
- 3 Answers
- 9301 Views
- TCS, I also Faced
- E-Mail Answers
Answer Posted / sruthi
perform para means only that particular para will be
executed.
section can have one or more paras.
so perform section means the paras under that section will
be executed.
Thanks,
sruthi.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 6 Yes | 1 No |
Post New Answer View All Answers
Can we change the password using ALTER? anyone tried and changed?
How do you reference the following file formats from cobol programs?
what happens if parmparameter passes zero bytes to the program
Program A (Normal COBBAT) calling a B Program (DB2COBOL, COBBATDB which is using a VSAM file. its a dynamic call. How we will handle VSAM file decleration in our from JCL from where we are running A PGM. And should we have PLAN for A pGM also. if possible can some one post a sample JCL. Thanks for help in advance.
how do you reference the fixed unblock file formats from cobol programs
if we have " ibm mainframe ",in that how to remove first and last leading space eg:"ibm mainframe" like that the answer we need
Write down the divisions of cobol program?
can anybody post me about file-aid and changemen tools pls and give me reference if any mainframe guys are there
How to find out the closest prime number of an input number? I believe it has something to do with SEARCH and COBOL Linear Array.
1.Is it possible to move the data from 99.99 to 99v99? 2.What is the CICS-vsam Compilation process? 3.In My GDG 5 generation will be there GDG3 got an abend what will happen? 4.In my GDG first generation is +1 And I want to add the new generation what will happen previous generation? 5.How can you give the PIC clause below conditions A). s9 (reddy), B). s9 (5) occurs 5 times? 6.How override the proc from a particular step? and what is symbolic and override Procs?
I have a program with an Array of 5000 occurences which is being passed from 5 sub levels to the front end screen. Thess 5 programs using each 5*2 = 10 different arrays with size as 5000. This is causing the transaction to utilize more storage consupmtion. I am looking to reduce the storage consumption. As part of that initially i thought Dynamic array may solve my problem. After viewing the comments given i see its same as normal array. IS there any other way we can resolve this issue?
Our issue is there seems to be a disconnect, or no link, between our SELECT statement and our SD. We had SELECT SORT-FILE and SELECT SORT-FILE ASSIGN TO SORTWRK. ASSIGN TO SORTWRK1 SORTWRK2 SORTWRK3 SORTWRK4. with SD SORT_FILE RECORD CONTAINS 7833 CHARACTERS. In either case, at run time, the system ignored our SORTWRK# DD statements and allocated 16 sort works with the SORTWK## naming convention. Any ideas why the system does not recognize the connection? We do not even need the SORTWRK DD statements. Thanks
Is it possible that the redefines clause has different picture clauses compared to the one it redefined?
What are the access modes of START statement?
EXPLAIN MAIN FRAME TESTING PROCESS...HOW TO FIX THE MAINFRAME BUGS?
