What will happen if we write code like: try{}catch(exception e)catch(IOExcepti

Categories >> Software >> Java Related >> Java J2EE >> Core Java
Suggest New Category

What will happen if we write code like:
try{}catch(exception e)catch(IOException i)

Question Posted / guest

6 Answers
11166 Views
CTS, TCS, I also Faced
E-Mail Answers

Answers were Sorted based on User's Feedback

What will happen if we write code like: try{}catch(exception e)catch(IOException i)..

Answer / guest

It will not compile.

Is This Answer Correct ?

26 Yes

8 No

What will happen if we write code like: try{}catch(exception e)catch(IOException i)..

Answer / sitaram

it is not complied. because first catch having child
exception and last exception having parent exception is must.
correct answer is :
try{
}
catch(IOException i){
}
catch(Exception e){
}

Is This Answer Correct ?

19 Yes

2 No

What will happen if we write code like: try{}catch(exception e)catch(IOException i)..

Answer / maurice johnson

Ignoring the incorrect syntax of the Try\Catch Block, it
will never reach the IOException portion of the
Catch......the first catch will always be triggered due to
it only Catching type Exception.

Is This Answer Correct ?

12 Yes

3 No

What will happen if we write code like: try{}catch(exception e)catch(IOException i)..

Answer / jahri

yes it should be child exception to base exception

Is This Answer Correct ?

4 Yes

1 No

What will happen if we write code like: try{}catch(exception e)catch(IOException i)..

Answer / mathi

Ignoring the incorrect syntax of the Try\Catch Block, it
will never reach the IOException portion of the
Catch......the first catch will always be triggered due to
it only Catching type Exception.

Is This Answer Correct ?

1 Yes

1 No

What will happen if we write code like: try{}catch(exception e)catch(IOException i)..

Answer / sonal

I knew the answer but tried it to get the exact compile
time error. It reads "exception java.io.IOException is
already been caught".

Is This Answer Correct ?

2 Yes

2 No

Post New Answer