what is the difference between a leader and a a manager
- 7 Answers
- 11684 Views
- I also Faced
- E-Mail Answers
Answer Posted / abdul lathif
manager is a person who manages & take major decision in a
an organisation, whereas the leader has the responsibility
to give required suggessions & keeping the subbordinates in
a right track!
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 1 Yes | 0 No |
Post New Answer View All Answers
why are you interested in Management?
hello sir! i am jot n i have applied for student visa which was rejected in july and officer didnt gave my any reason for that.he only asked me that i m applying first time? n second thing he asked m that which university?i told him both the answer but suddenly he said m sorry and didnt gave any reason now i have applied for second time and my interview is in few days..can you please tell m how should i coveince the officer n please tell m if he ask m why i have choosen this university only as there are many other?? should i tell him features or good points of the university??
If one always ought to act so as to produce the best possible circumstances, then morality is extremely demanding. No one could plausibly claim to have met the requirements of this "simple principle." . . . It would seem strange to punish those intending to do good by sentencing them to an impossible task. Also, if the standards of right conduct are as extreme as they seem, then they will preclude the personal projects that humans find most fulfilling. From an analytic perspective, the potential extreme demands of morality are not a "problem." A theory of morality is no less valid simply because it asks great sacrifices. In fact, it is difficult to imagine what kind of constraints could be put on our ethical projects. Shouldn't we reflect on our base prejudices, and not allow them to provide boundaries for our moral reasoning? Thus, it is tempting to simply dismiss the objections to the simple principle. However, in Demands of Morality, Liam Murphy takes these objections seriously for at least two distinct reasons. First, discussion of the simple principle provides an excellent vehicle for a discussion of morality in general. Perhaps, in a way, this is Murphy's attempt at doing philosophy "from the inside out.". . . Second, Murphy's starting point tells us about the nature of his project. Murphy must take seriously the collisions between moral philosophy and our intuitive sense of right and wrong. He [must do so] because his work is best interpreted as intended to forge moral principles from our firm beliefs, and not to proscribe beliefs given a set of moral principles. [Murphy] argues from our considered judgments rather than to them. . . For example, Murphy cites our "simple but firmly held" beliefs as supporting the potency of the over- demandingness objection, and nowhere in the work can one find a source of moral values divorced from human preferences. Murphy does not tell us what set of "firm beliefs" we ought to have. Rather, he speaks to an audience of well- intentioned but unorganized moral realists, and tries to give them principles that represent their considered moral judgments. Murphy starts with this base sense of right and wrong, but recognizes that it needs to be supplemented by reason where our intuitions are confused or conflicting. Perhaps Murphy is looking for the best interpretation of our convictions, the same way certain legal scholars try to find the best interpretation of our Constitution. This approach has disadvantages. Primarily, Murphy's arguments, even if successful, do not provide the kind of motivating force for which moral philosophy has traditionally searched. His work assumes and argues in terms of an inner sense of morality, and his project seeks to deepen that sense. Of course, it is quite possible that the moral viewpoints of humans will not converge, and some humans have no moral sense at all. Thus, it is very easy for the moral skeptic to point out a lack of justification and ignore the entire work. On the other hand, Murphy's choice of a starting point avoids many of the problems of moral philosophy. Justifying the content of moral principles and granting a motivating force to those principles is an extraordinary task. It would be unrealistic to expect all discussions of moral philosophy to derive such justifications. Projects that attempt such a derivation have value, but they are hard pressed to produce logical consequences for everyday life. In the end, Murphy's strategy may have more practical effect than its first-principle counterparts, which do not seem any more likely to convince those that would reject Murphy's premises. 1) The author suggests that the application of Murphy's philosophy to the situations of two different groups: a) would help to solve the problems of one group but not of the other. b) could result in the derivation of two radically different moral principles. c) would be contingent on the two groups sharing the same fundamental beliefs. d) could reconcile any differences between the two groups. 2) Suppose an individual who firmly believes in keeping promises has promised to return a weapon to a person she knows to be extremely dangerous. According to Murphy, which of the following, if true, would WEAKEN the notion that she should return the weapon? a) She also firmly believes that it is morally wrong to assist in any way in a potentially violent act. b) She believes herself to be well-intentioned in matters of right and wrong. c) The belief that one should keep promises is shared by most members of her community. d) She derived her moral beliefs from first-principle ethical philosophy. 3) The passage implies that a moral principle derived from applying Murphy's philosophy to a particular group would be applicable to another group if: a) the first group recommended the principle to the second group. b) the moral viewpoints of the two groups do not converge. c) the members of the second group have no firmly held beliefs. d) the second group shares the same fundamental beliefs as the first group. 4) According to the passage, the existence of individuals who entirely lack a moral sense: a) confirms the notion that moral principles should be derived from the considered judgments of individuals. b) suggests a potential disadvantage of Murphy's philosophical approach. c) supports Murphy's belief that reason is necessary in cases in which intuitions are conflicting or confused. d) proves that first-principle strategies of ethical theorizing will have no more influence over the behavior of individuals than will Murphy's philosophical approach. 5) Which of the following can be inferred about "doing philosophy from the inside out?" a) Murphy was the first philosopher to employ such an approach. b) It allows no place for rational argument in the formation of ethical principles. c) It is fundamentally different from the practice of first-principle philosophy. d) It is designed to dismiss objections to the "simple principle." 6) A school board is debating whether or not to institute a dress code for the school's students. According to Murphy, the best way to come to an ethical decision would be to: a) consult the fundamental beliefs of the board members. b) analyze the results of dress codes instituted at other schools. c) survey the students as to whether or not they would prefer a dress code. d) determine whether or note a dress code has ever been instituted in the school's history.
hi can somebody please post questions that are commonly asked in bba enterance exam in interwiew sessions...also it would be of great help if someone could mail me the previous years papers of the enterance exam of bba of cbs...
Describe the process of data tabulation using SPSS
the official time (working hours) of juan magalang is 7:00 am to 4:00pm.lunch break is one hour that is from 12:00-1:00pm. the management allows a grace period of 10 minutes for lates. more than 10 minutes late is deducted one hour as punishment. juan works from monday to friday his official time are as follows. am pm overtime in out in out in out monday 7:05 12:05 1:00 4:05 tuesday 6:59 12:01 12:58 4:03 wednesday 7:15 12:04 12:56 4:00 thursday 6:56 12:01 1:05 4:00 4:00 10:00 friday 7:01 12:10 12:50 4:05 his daily rate is 404 pesos, this include the COLA. if SSS deduction is 100 pesos per month Philhealth contribution is 100 pesos and Pag-ibig fund is 100 pesos. if he is married with 2 kids ages 10 to 12 years old how much tax will be deducted from his income? assuming payroll is every 15th and 30th of the month, compute for his take home pay, if tax,SSS, Pag-ibig and Philhealth are deducted on the 15th of the month, how much will be received on the 15th and 30th assuming table shown are the same for the three other weeks.
HI friends Iam ASHISH ADHIKARI from Nepal,Kathmandu.My interview date is in 29November at 9am.this question is asked to my friend on 24november interview date....he is lucky and he get VISA..Now its my turn.what to do??? 1-Which University do you apply too? 2-Which one accept you? 3-Tell me about your university? 4-How long will You stay in USA? 5-Why did you apply to this university? 6-These subject can also be found in your college why you have entire to go to USA? 7-Who is sponsoring you? 8-What is your university expenses? 9-Your bank statement shows that you have just put money in the bank?how can we say that it is your money?u can also have lend it? 10-Why did you choose USA but not Canada or Germany?
WHAT IS SENSEX?
Why Does Currency Value Fluctuates?
Distinguish between Profit and Loss Account and trading a/c
why are U looking for this vacancy
Hi,How much gap is there between Paper-I,II and III of Group-II exams?
what ur future aspiration and how can we (mba institute) will help you to pursue your goal???
why you done mba in finance
caurren capacity calculator of Copper and aluminium wire
