What’s the main differences between exchange 5.5 and
Exchange 2000/2003
- 5 Answers
- 16280 Views
- I also Faced
- E-Mail Answers
Answer Posted / muthiah nagarajan
The primary differences are...
-Exchange 2000/2003 does not have its own directory or
directory service; it uses Active Directory instead.
-Exchange 2000/2003 uses native components of Windows 2000
(namely, IIS and its SMTP, NNTP, W3SVC and other
components, Kerberos and others) for many core functions.
-SMTP is now a full peer to RPC, and is it the default
transport protocol between Exchange 2000/2003 servers.
-Exchange 2000/2003 supports Active/Active clustering and
was recently certified for Windows 2000 Datacenter/2003.
-Exchange 2000/2003 scales much higher.
-It boasts conferencing services and instant messaging.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 27 Yes | 1 No |
Post New Answer View All Answers
Explain the change in outlook client connection behaviour when compared with exchange 2010?
Do I need windows xp to use outlook rpc over http?
What are the new adc tools?
How do I disable owa for a single user in exchange 2000/2003?
Explain how do I find an smtp mail address in active directory if active directory users and computers tells me it is in use when I try to create a new user
How do I filter incoming mail by subject or attachment?
Explain how do I verify oma is functioning?
What’s new in protection and compliance?
If there is still an m: drive mapped, why does the free space number look funny?
Do I still have to cycle the services on fail back like in 2000 active/passive mode?
Can I use the windows 2003 active directory connector with exchange 2003?
What action does front end trport service does?
What do I need in order to install exchange 2003?
What do the various queue names mean?
Is there any way to append a text message to all out bound email for exchange 2003?
