What’s the main differences between exchange 5.5 and
Exchange 2000/2003
Answer Posted / rishi
Exchange 5.5 does not integrate with the NT4 domain or the
Windows 2000/2003 Active Directory in a meaningful way. A
single user could be associated with several different
mailboxes. Exchange 2000/2003/2007 integrates tightly with
Active Directory, and there is a 1:1 relationship between
mailboxes and AD user accounts.
There are other differences, depending on whether you have
a standard or enterprise version as it relates to maximum
database size, but the directory integration is probably
the biggest difference.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 42 Yes | 3 No |
Post New Answer View All Answers
Explain how do I verify oma is functioning?
Do I still have to cycle the services on fail back like in 2000 active/passive mode?
Tell me a bit about the capabilities of exchange server?
What is exchange 2003 forestprep?
How do I configure the recovery storage group?
Can I use exchange 5.5s owa to access a mailbox on an exchange 2003 server?
What are the prerequisites required to install exchange server 2013?
If there is still an m: drive mapped, why does the free space number look funny?
On what conditions exchange 2013 can coexists with previous version of exchange servers?
How can I get a list of connection agreements in exchange 2003 adc?
Is single instance storage maintained when moving users between servers | storage groups | databases?
Explain how do I move the log files?
Is there an easier way to move mailboxes grouped by mailbox.store?
What are the types of active directory deployment that server supported in exchange server 2010 deployment?
What are the new features in ms exchange 2013?