Interested to Buy Any Domain ? << Click Here >> for more details...
Answer Posted / nashad najimudeen
CO-PA cycle is the profitability analysis cycle for the
products sold under a profit center.
A Multi-level analysis could be conducted using CO-PA by way
of Customer, Region, Sales Agent, etc.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 12 Yes | 5 No |
Post New Answer View All Answers
What is the main control parameter for settlement?
You are entered a credit memo posting to vendor who is linked to a customer on 1st of May 2003 for your company code but you have not specifically entered the same data in customer till now. You have lots of entries appearing in the vendor and customer account prior to that date of May 2003 also. You are making a manual payment to the vendor ? select out of the following which statements are correct. a. Credit memo document will get the special payment term as per vendor master definition. b. Customer items will not be shown while paying the vendor as customer is not linked. c. Customer items will be shown only postings after the date 1st May 2003. d. All items of customer and vendor will be available for payment provided payment is same from 1st May 2003. e. All items of customer and vendor will be available for payment provided Special GL items are also selected in selection screen irrespective of the activation date
Can we post less amount through standard payment?. how?
What are the different line item reports? : cost center accounting
What happen if company were Implemented only FICO module and what is the disadantages?
Why is preliminary cost estimate required?
what do you mean by the field status group?
How do you go about configuring material ledger?
What is the document change rule? : fi- general ledger
What is a retained earning account? And how many retained earning accounts can be defined in sap system?
SAP DEPRECIATION RUN ERROR: I have a problem with depreciation posting. I have searched the forum but did not find any answer. Net book value of $ 559,350 as on April 2012 was fully depreciated by 31 Mar 2017. Additions between April 2012 and March 2017 were correctly depreciated. However, additions from 01 Apr 2017 were fully depreciated when depreciation program was executed. For example, asset acquisition on 01 May 2017 $ 2400 was fully depreciated ($ 2400) which is not correct. It should be $ 2000*20%/12*11 = $ 440. Subsequently, in Jan 2018, on the acquisition of $ 207, the system has posted a positive depreciation of $ 47,469 on the base value of $ 1,640,423.72!!! More surprisingly, acquisition after that is correctly depreciated. For example, acquisition on Jan of $ 3,488.94 was correctly depreciated by $ 174.45 (3488.94*20%/12*3 months). Here are the details of the configuration of depreciation: · Depreciation method SLM · Base method 0014 · Useful life: 5 years (20% depreciation). · Period control 01/01/01/01 · Depreciation after the end of planned life – the box is “checked”. · There is only ordinary depreciation. · “Only negative values and zero allowed” checked in Rule for positive/negative sign for ordinary depreciation in Depreciation Area. · Fiscal year: April to March · SAP ECC 6.0 Can anybody suggest/help how to fix this?
hi my name kali i have 6 month experience in sap fico module how to get job kindly help me
How can reason codes help with incoming payment processing? : fi- accounts receivable
What is reconciliation account?
Steps to config IT Depreciation
