Golgappa.net | Golgappa.org | BagIndia.net | BodyIndia.Com | CabIndia.net | CarsBikes.net | CarsBikes.org | CashIndia.net | ConsumerIndia.net | CookingIndia.net | DataIndia.net | DealIndia.net | EmailIndia.net | FirstTablet.com | FirstTourist.com | ForsaleIndia.net | IndiaBody.Com | IndiaCab.net | IndiaCash.net | IndiaModel.net | KidForum.net | OfficeIndia.net | PaysIndia.com | RestaurantIndia.net | RestaurantsIndia.net | SaleForum.net | SellForum.net | SoldIndia.com | StarIndia.net | TomatoCab.com | TomatoCabs.com | TownIndia.com
Interested to Buy Any Domain ? << Click Here >> for more details...

when load type is selected as bulk or normal in session level ?let me know the internal process and give me an example?

Answer Posted / skg

A:when you run a session with Normal load IS commits data into the target table as well as commits rowid into a log table.
For Example: you have 10000 records in your source,while loading data if your session fails at any point of time then there is a scope of recovery.After you fetch the issue when you rerun the job you need to ensure that your session is running with Normal load and instead of loading from the scratch,IS connect to the Repository service then Repo service connect to the Repo Database and check what is the last rowid commited in the log table and start loading from the max rowid+1 on wards.

checkpoint at session level: Resume From Last save heckpoint
BulkLoad: when you run a session with Bulk load the IS loads the data into target table and it won't commit any rowid into the log table. so performance will be good because only one operation is happing here but if session is failed at any point of time then there is no scope of recovery.
Note: when you work with Bulk load you need to ensure that there is no indexes on target table.if it has indexes your session get fails.
Q: I want to use bulk load and i have indexes on target table can't i access?
A: Yes you can achieve this by ensuring the option
Pre-SQL as :Drop Index index_Name;
Post-SQL as:create Index index_Name on table_Name(col_Name);

Is This Answer Correct ?    1 Yes 0 No



Post New Answer       View All Answers


Please Help Members By Posting Answers For Below Questions

Suppose on 1st Nov 2010 you had created a mapping which includes huge aggregator calculations and it is under process for next two days. You will notice that even on 3rd day also its still calculating. So without changing a logic or changing a mapping How will you troubleshot or to run that mapping? Explain the steps

1992


Explain the pipeline partition with real time example?

1090


What are the main features of Oracle 8i with context to datawarehouse?

2059


How to extract the informatica rejected data?

1169


How to join three sources using joiner? Explain though mapping flow.

1100


What all are steps in up gradation of Informatica server?

1001


Why union transformation is an active transformation?

1001


What is lookup change?

998


can we override a native sql query within informatica? Where do we do it? How do we do it?

1019


suppose we are using dynamic lookup cache and in lookup condition the record is succeeded but in target it is failed due to some reasons then what happened in the cache ?

7094


What is the difference between STOP and ABORT options in Workflow Monitor?

1196


update strategy transformation in informatica

1024


Difference between Data and Index Caches?

1101


Hi, In source I have records like this No name address 10 manoj mum 10 manoj dilhi 20 kumar usa 20 kumar Tokyo I want records in target like shown below No name addr1 addr2 10 manoj mum dilhi 20 kumar usa Tokyo If it is reverse we can do this by using Normalizer transformation by setting occurance as 2. Somebody will say use denoralization technique. But as of my knowledge I couldn’t find any denormalization technique. Is there any concept like that? I tryid this seriously but I could find any idea to implement this. Can any one please help me ? Advance Thanks

7906


What are the conditions needed to improve the performance of informatica aggregator transformation?

1041