In-house Cash functionality allows “Consolidate the request and make payment on behalf of subsidiaries. “ Can some one help me understand how this is different from Sending Company code and Paying company code concept?
Answer Posted / rohit duggal
SAP In-House Cash is used for processing internal and external payment transactions within a GROUP or Company. By using SAP In-House Cash you can reduce the number of external bank accounts you hold and the volume of foreign payments you have to make. SAP In-House Cash is implemented at a central location within a group of companies. In case of sending company and paying company code , it happens when two different company codes are involved in the transaction.
Hope it helps ! Cheers !
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 3 Yes | 0 No |
Post New Answer View All Answers
What is individual processing of gl accounts? : fi- general ledger
What is an asset class catalog? : fi- asset accounting
How do you manage outgoing partial payment for the vendor in fi?
what is the customization to be done when we save the purchase order sys should pass the mail to manager purchases for approval or release
What is the difference between a product cost collector and production order?
How to FI integrate with MM and SD.
What is individual processing of gl accounts? : fi- general ledger accounting
What do you mean by chart of accounts? What are its important elements?
Tell me the 3 to 4 functional specification?
1. Tell me Some of AS IS sceniours you have come accross in your projects (related to FICO modul) 2. Tell me some expamples of Gap Analysis that you have come accross in your respective module ie in FICO 3. Tell me some of expample of BPR
explain 2 business scenarios which do you feel have considerable significance and what kind of solutions did you offer while working on the projects?
What is done by gr/or regrouping program?
SAP DEPRECIATION RUN ERROR: I have a problem with depreciation posting. I have searched the forum but did not find any answer. Net book value of $ 559,350 as on April 2012 was fully depreciated by 31 Mar 2017. Additions between April 2012 and March 2017 were correctly depreciated. However, additions from 01 Apr 2017 were fully depreciated when depreciation program was executed. For example, asset acquisition on 01 May 2017 $ 2400 was fully depreciated ($ 2400) which is not correct. It should be $ 2000*20%/12*11 = $ 440. Subsequently, in Jan 2018, on the acquisition of $ 207, the system has posted a positive depreciation of $ 47,469 on the base value of $ 1,640,423.72!!! More surprisingly, acquisition after that is correctly depreciated. For example, acquisition on Jan of $ 3,488.94 was correctly depreciated by $ 174.45 (3488.94*20%/12*3 months). Here are the details of the configuration of depreciation: · Depreciation method SLM · Base method 0014 · Useful life: 5 years (20% depreciation). · Period control 01/01/01/01 · Depreciation after the end of planned life – the box is “checked”. · There is only ordinary depreciation. · “Only negative values and zero allowed” checked in Rule for positive/negative sign for ordinary depreciation in Depreciation Area. · Fiscal year: April to March · SAP ECC 6.0 Can anybody suggest/help how to fix this?
Name any 5 CO tables and How do CO Consultants use the CO tables and other tables?
What is the document change rule? : fi- general ledger