In which case did the Supreme Court hold that the Preamble
was not a part of the Constitution?
(A) Berubari case
(B) Golak Nath case
(C) Keshavananda Bharati case
(D) None of the above
Answer Posted / burhan
There has been a controversy on the point whether the
preamble is a part of the Constitution or not until 1973
when the Supreme Court of India observed, inKesavananda
Bharti V. state of kerala (1973) 4 SCC 225, that the
preamble is a part of the Constitution. Thus overruling its
earlier decision that “the preamble is not a part of the
Constitution” as given in Re: berubari union (1) (1960) 3
SCR 250.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 16 Yes | 1 No |
Post New Answer View All Answers
Who are the Bharat Ratna Awardees in the year 2016?
from where was india's first satellite launched?
Which country has allocated US$ 10 billion to provide relief to its earthquake victims?
CHARACTER CERTIFICATE format" Plz send me anyone have . sreejachandranc@gmail.com
What is the Currency for Hongkong?
Name any Veteran Olympian Medalist and Politician.
ascorbic acid is the chemical name for which vitamin?
Lancer is the product of which company?
What is the capital of Mozambique?
who wrote the book "Discovery of India" ?
who won the recent oscar award for indian music?
hello sir ow to i prepare my gk my gk is so week.my i m fill up fourm of delhi police SI post. so plz reply
what is the meaning of zealot?
India conducted Military Exercise Garuda Sakthi with which state?
what is aql