Among "Move" and "Move Corresponding", which is efficient one?
- 6 Answers
- 19299 Views
- I also Faced
- E-Mail Answers
Answer Posted / abaper
I think Move-corresponding is better than Move.
Think you want to transfer data between two internal tables
of different type, e.g. 10 fields
I saw comment above that move-corresponding will have to
look all the fields and then transfer which takes time.
That's true but what if you have used Move. There will be
10 lines of code and it also does the transfer only. So
performence wise there is not big difference.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 2 Yes | 1 No |
Post New Answer View All Answers
Of the two call transaction and session method, which is faster?
Can we reuse a userexit?
Define database layer? : abap data dictionary
What is the difference between a pool table and a transparent table?
What are the data types of internal tables?
What are the difference between call screen and leave screen?
What is asap methodology? : sap abap hr
how to use table control?if suppose i have 6 records and i want more 4 records in sequence.How to handle this scenario?
What is the difference between sum and collect?
What is partner selection?
What is the difference between semi-monthly and Bi-weekly payroll area
Mention the various databases integrities?
Abstract class and interface, multiple inheritance, live example
What is a type group?
while implementing badi what are the tables u find??
