Interested to Buy Any Domain ? << Click Here >> for more details...
Please anybody explain the interaction of tester with
developers and team lead regarding bugs or any issue, how
they interact? How they discuss... Plz be clear in detail
- 6 Answers
- 10956 Views
- eSymbiosis, Infosys, I also Faced
- E-Mail Answers
Answer Posted / stephen
Effective communication with developers ensures efficient
QA for testers
Developers and testers in the network device space share a
unique peer relationship, yet they often experience
communication problems during the quality assurance (QA)
process. One might think this is the result of using
different tools and technologies, or working in disparate
locations, separated by time zones and language. But even
when development and testing take place in the same
building, communication problems still exist.
Why? Traditional communication methods don't work for
today's testing organizations. Devices are becoming
increasingly more complex and require more testing prior to
release. More than ever, interaction between developers and
testers needs to be clear and efficient.
It's also important to note that communication problems
between developers and testers are common, and not limited
to small or new manufacturers. Some of the world's leading
device makers have struggled with communication issues and
paid the price-from more bugs to slowdowns in product
releases.
With the right technology and a willingness to change
behavior, testing organizations can overcome the
communication obstacles common to the QA process. The key
is to standardize communication practices.
Developers and testers face a range of communication issues-
from misinformation to complete breakdowns-throughout the
QA process. Both teams are committed to delivering a
quality product, but neither has the communication
practices in place to help them work together toward this
goal.
For example, testing organizations often have no means of
ensuring a successful knowledge transfer from developers to
testers. This is particularly evident-and dangerous-when
organizations must test a large quantity of new features.
Testers typically must perform the initial testing of new
features arriving from development, as well as document
test cases to be incorporated into a test plan for the new
release. Yet testers seldom have more than a marketing or
engineering spec on the new feature. They usually have no
data about the tests performed in development. The reason:
Developers did not have the time or tools to document the
test setup and procedures used in the development feature
validation process.
Testers then have to spend time learning about the new
feature and developing a "positive test case" that
duplicates what the developers did with the feature. This
leaves testers with little time to design and perform more
thorough testing (i.e., negative testing, feature
interaction, boundary testing), and greatly increases the
risk of undiscovered bugs.
Communication also can break down along the path from
testers to developers, even when a formal system is in
place. For example, when testers discover what they think
is a product defect, they may enter information into a
formal bug tracking system. Or, they may simply check with
the developer (face-to-face or by phone or e-mail) to
certify that it's a defect, and not an intended behaviour
or unsupported use case.
Most bug tracking systems require the tester to summarize
(in words) and perhaps cut and paste data to prove the
product or feature is not performing. However, a simple or
high-level overview often won't include a detailed log of
their activity, making it difficult for developers to
recreate the testing process.
And, if the defect does appear to be valid, developers
might need to investigate the defect on the tester's
testbed, tying up the tester's workstation.
Testing organizations can resolve these problems and
increase efficiency by standardizing communications
throughout the QA process. This requires a combination of
testing tool technology and personal commitment. Following
are a few proven methods:
• Capture every interaction: To facilitate effective
communication, developers and testers should have tools
that capture, automatically log and store every
interaction. In addition, they need readable, structured
and executable reports that include step timing, actions
performed and response data for all interactions.
• Document test cases in the language of the device:
To ensure that the test cases can be read and universally
understood by all testers and developers, no matter their
location, language, or scripting expertise, test cases
should be documented in the language of the device.
• Ensure a smooth hand-off: To combat knowledge
transfer issues, a standard QA process should capture the
details of a developer's "positive unit test" and
automatically report the results to the responsible
engineer, or enter it into a document management system.
• Facilitate meaningful communication: To resolve
communication issues found in typical bug reports, QA
testing should include a comprehensive report of the
tester's activities, giving anyone reviewing bugs complete
data. The report file should also be executable, if
reproduction is necessary.
• Confirm true defects: To help testers confirm that
an observed behavior is indeed a defect, the QA process
should include electronically transmitted reports. This
built-in efficiency eliminates interruptions by developers
who want to access the tester's testbed.
With the right tools and techniques, testing organizations
can improve communication between developers and testers,
increase the effectiveness of the debugging process and
improve overall QA efficiency. This represents a win not
only for developers and testers, but also for management by
providing efficient product development cycles and faster
time to market.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 2 Yes | 0 No |
Post New Answer View All Answers
1.Tell me negative test cases for notepad 2.Tell me the factors for for writing severity based test cases
What are the main key components in web applications and client and server applications? And explain the differences between them?
What is the different between SIT and UIT?
plz send the test scenarios and test cases for "user name should contain 4 to 8 chars and they should have only vowels"
hi friends, i have completed course and project on insurance domain in mindq testing institution...can any working employee please tell me ,which notes( testing subject notes,project notes)i have to prefer first.i was studied both notes and getting confussion.one of my friend got job throughly only project notes and said that project notes is enough to get job.in which way ,i have to prepare interview( which important topics first ), if you are follow any strategy to interview purpose,pls send me important topics list.
If project wants to release in 3months what type of risk analysis you do in test plan?
What are testing techniques? What is difference between general and specific?
i heard that mainframe testing is diff from other environments & has lot of keyboard input????pl clarify my doubt & let me know in what way its diff??
Artifacts in design phase of SDLC ?
1. Give me an example of something you tried at work but did not work out so you had to go at things another way. can somebody give a real time example
what are the advantages of manual and automation testing ? and which one would u term as efficent testing and effective testing ?pls do reply thankx in advance
What type of questions will be asking for 2 years experience candidate in manual testing?
1.what is the approach while writing test cases in your project. 2.tell some intresting scenareo in your project
How do you determine user soad for a perf test of a Web application?
can you show me the test cases on registration form
