Interested to Buy Any Domain ? << Click Here >> for more details...
performance wise which one is better in joiner and lookup transformation?why?explain clearly?
- 4 Answers
- 21210 Views
- IBM, I also Faced
- E-Mail Answers
Answer Posted / basha
based on the situation if we need to cache concept we will
use lkp tr ,we doesnot need to caches we use joiner tr
performence wise joiner is better
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 1 Yes | 5 No |
Post New Answer View All Answers
how can we find the bottle neck in SQL Query in SOURCE QUALIFIER, and how can we tune it..?
what is unit testing?tell me proceedure
rank() over (partition by opt2.dim_plat_site_id, opt2.dim_site_opt_sid order by case when opt2.dm_market_flg in ('Y', 'U') then 1 else 2 end, lkp.contact_rank) as rank1, case opt2.contact_type when 'Buyer' then row_number() over (partition by opt2.dim_plat_site_id, opt2.dim_site_opt_sid, lkp.contact_rank order by has_name_flg desc, ship_to_flg desc , last_order_dt desc) when 'Decision Maker' then row_number() over (partition by opt2.dim_plat_site_id, opt2.dim_site_opt_sid, lkp.contact_rank order by has_name_flg desc , last_quote_dt desc , mailability_score desc , source_ranking desc) when 'Influencer' then row_number() over (partition by opt2.dim_plat_site_id, opt2.dim_site_opt_sid, lkp.contact_rank order by has_name_flg desc, mailability_score desc, source_ranking desc) when 'Payer' then row_number() over (partition by opt2.dim_plat_site_id, opt2.dim_site_opt_sid, lkp.contact_rank order by has_name_flg desc, mailability_score desc, source_ranking desc) --elu 05/28/2013 else row_number() over (partition by opt2.dim_plat_site_id, opt2.dim_site_opt_sid, lkp.contact_rank order by has_name_flg desc, mailability_score desc, source_ranking desc) end rank2 row_number() over (partition by opt3.dim_plat_site_id, opt3.dim_site_opt_sid order by rank1,rank2) as "rank", case when "rank"<= opt3.maximum_value then 'Y' else 'N' end as include_flg
Which development components of informatica have the highest usage?
Explain the use of aggregator cache file?
Suppose on 1st Nov 2010 you had created a mapping which includes huge aggregator calculations and it is under process for next two days. You will notice that even on 3rd day also its still calculating. So without changing a logic or changing a mapping How will you troubleshot or to run that mapping? Explain the steps
Can we create multiple integration service on single repository?
I have worked on Informatica 7.1.1. I want to know the answer for the below question. Target is not created initially.Then how to take the DDL script from the source and run the Mapping by creating the Target dynamically?Is it possible by SQL Transformation?
what is the complex transformation you used in informatica
Explain the difference between a data warehouse and a data mart?
IN SCD1, insource we have 10 billion records and in the first day its uploaded successfully and in the second day its taking time to upload because some records it might get update or insert new records. As a developer what will be the better solution for this??
What is informatica?
how to load rows into fact table in data warehouse
How you know when to use a static cache and dynamic cache in lookup transformation?
can anybody send me some real time screenshots of mapping in informatica powercenter. i will be vary thankful to him. my e-mail id :- prakashkumar.kumhar@gmail.com
