Why Java is not purely object oriented?
Answer Posted / elecen
Java is mostly an OOP language, but
We expect an OOP language to support:
Multiple Inheritance (not just implementations)
Overloading of operators
Java is inconvenient because:
Doesn't support Pointers :\
Both lightweight and heavyweight controls are CRAPPY!
You need to write hundreds of overhead code just to add some
typical functionality!
Doesn't provide access to some centralized message loop!!! :\
Java Sucks Big Time Because:
Takes like a zillion years to execute code that would take
just a few nano seconds in C++
Has HUGE loading times compared to C++
Is a memory leech!!!
Can't pass objects by reference!!! (mentioned pointers
already, didn't I? ;) :\
Java's nice because:
Runs anywhere a JRE is available :)
But then again, QT based apps run on Win, Linux and Mac, so
why bother?! :p
Bottom Line:
I have NOT a clue why they insist in teaching Java in
universities, while the BEST approaching method has ALWAYS
been C++ with some Assembly :D
Cheerz
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 2 Yes | 4 No |
Post New Answer View All Answers
What is meant by tab pans?
Why destructor is not used in java?
Is java 1.7 the same as java 7?
Can an anonymous class be declared as implementing an interface and extending a class in java programming?
Are maps ordered java?
Why string is immutable with example?
Why javac is not recognized?
What is the return type of the main method?
What is null statement?
When can an object reference be cast to an interface reference in java programming?
What are annotations in java?
How big is a gigabyte?
What is array sorting in java?
What are the differences between string and stringbuffer?
What is the difference between notify and notifyall method?