Answer Posted / Gaurav Upadhyaya
No, the HAVING clause is used in conjunction with the GROUP BY clause to filter groups and not individual rows. If you want to apply a condition on individual rows, it should be done using WHERE clause.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 0 Yes | 0 No |
Post New Answer View All Answers
How raid can influence database performance?
How to rebuild the master database?
List out the different types of locks available in sql server?
What is an indexed view?
This question asked during interview, 2) At the end of each month, a new table is created for each bank that contains monthly metrics consolidated at the account level. The table naming convention is bankX_YYYYMM where X represents the numeric designation of the bank and YYYYMM indicates the 4 digit year and 2 digit month. The tables contain the following fields: name data type description account text account number registered boolean indicates whether the account is registered num_trans integer number of transactions made during the time period spend numeric(9,2) total spend during the time period a) Write a SQL query that will display the total number of transactions and total spend for "Bank1" during the 4th quarter of 2009. b) Write a SQL query that will display the total number of transactions and total spend at "Bank1" and "Bank2", broken out by registered vs. non-registered accounts, during January 2010 not sure what is correct answer and how to solve?
How do I find the sql server version?
Why we use the openxml clause?
How can you append an identity column to a temporary table?
Is it possible to have clustered index on separate drive from original table location?
What are the kinds of subquery?
What is the difference between upgrade and migration in sql server?
What is sql server query analyzer?
What is the difference between for xml raw and for xml auto?
What are the source of constraints?
what is spatial nonclustered index
