PLS-00423: ORDER BY item must be the number of a SELECT-list
expression
- 1 Answers
- 3082 Views
- I also Faced
- E-Mail Answers
Answer Posted / guest
Cause: A column alias was used in the ORDER BY clause of a
SELECT statement that uses a UNION, INTERSECT, or MINUS set
operator. This is not allowed. In such cases, expressions in
the ORDER BY clause must be unsigned integers that designate
the ordinal positions of select-list items.
Action: Change the alias in the ORDER BY clause to an
unsigned integer that designates the ordinal position of the
select item in question.
Please add more information about this Error
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 1 Yes | 0 No |
Post New Answer View All Answers
ORA-26095: unprocessed stream data exists
IMG-02003: 2FF03 - incorrect color histogram feature specification
ORA-26028: index string.string initially in unusable state
IMP-00070: Lob definitions in dump file are inconsistent with database.
IMP-00063: Warning: Skipping table "string"."string" because object type "string"."string" cannot be created or has different identifier
ORA-26030: index string.string had string partitions made unusable due to:
ORA-26094: stream format error: input column overflow
ORA-16626: failed to enable specified object
if the lengths of two wires are same and the area of cross sections is 4:7 then what will be the ratio of current passing through these wires
ORA-26076: cannot set or reset value after direct path structure is allocated
ORA-16627: No standby databases support the overall protection mode.
ORA-16516: The current state is invalid for the attempted operation.
IMP-00064: Definition of LOB was truncated by export
ORA-26079: file "string" is not part of table string.string
How to resolve QSM-01108 error. I have no OR conditions in my query, but do have 9 IN conditions. The error says the max limit is 2 while I have 257 number of disjuncts. However, if I remove even a single IN condition, the query is rewritten. I cannot change my query. How can I resolve this issue?
