Interested to Buy Any Domain ? << Click Here >> for more details...
why current ratio is 2:1.why it is not 100:1,10:1,20:1 in
current ratio. please tell me....
- 8 Answers
- 16807 Views
- Thomson Reuters, I also Faced
- E-Mail Answers
Answer Posted / random
The reason companies do not want to have current ratios which are too high is because it would mean current assets are not being used efficiently to generate positive cash flows in the future. A ratio of 100 to 1 is hardly ever heard of because it means the company has an overwhelming amount of cash and cash equivalents, but it is not investing in any projects which would be profitable in the future. Holding substantial amounts of cash would lead to great opportunity costs due to not investing in projects that otherwise would be profitable for the company.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 2 Yes | 0 No |
Post New Answer View All Answers
i wana give an interview as sr. excise officer what r the question will asked by interviewer ??? Please suggest me so I can clear inteview.thank u
example wrongly financial statments showing vat refund (under Advances) for the finanical year 08-09 , but present assement year after assement by cto given vat refund more than ledger showing balance then decided to every month set off vat payable to vat refund(advance) but more than recoverd compare with company and cto then what is the entry to be take.
What is icai?
Can CPF share given by govt. added in the Financial gross salary while calculating Total gross salary at the end of Financial year.For eg: My gross salary is Rs.X during a Fin. year & govt share of CPF is Y then Total Fin. Year gross salary is =X+Y,is it correct?
pass journal entry for Prepaid insurance
How do we calculate the cost of investment?
Tell me what is trial balance in accounting?
Hi, in Vendor Master i put in defualt data material in purchasing group in sap. now i want to report or list only purchasing group wise vendor only like subcontractor vendor list only how to get this?
M/s ABC Brothers, which was registered in the year 2000, has been following Straight Line Method (SLM) of depreciation. In the current year it changed its method from Straight Line to Written Down Value (WDV) Method, since such change would result in the additional depreciation of Rs. 200 lakhs as a result of which the firm would qualify to be declared as a sick industrial unit. The auditor raised objection to this change in the method of depreciation. The objection of the auditor is justified because (a) Change in the method of depreciation should be done only with the consent of the auditor (b) Depreciation method can be changed only from WDV to SLM and not vice versa (c) Change in the method of deprecation should be done only if it is required by some statute and change would result in appropriate presentation of financial 6 statement (d) Method of depreciation cannot be changed under any circumstances
what is debit balance report in SAP?. how do you describe DB report in brief.
what is a state cheque? how it differes from stale cheque?
Can share warrants issued by the company be considered as potential equity shares? If yes, then will it be considered for calculating dilutive EPS?
Re: CST RATE IS 1 % IF C FORM IS RECEIVABLE. IF C FORM IS NOT RECEIVED FULL AMOUNT WHAT WILL BE THE RATE OF CST
What is the difference between consigner and consignee?
credit card expenses entry kisme pass karenge
